Well the way I've always heard it described is we are using a magnetic funnel to attract interstellar helium and hydrogen to run our fusion engine.
This engine could also be used to deflect larger (but still tiny) particles from impacting by generating a second powerful magnetic field.
The fusion engine pushes out ionized hydrogen, sucks in same, just like a jet engine except magnetic rather than using metallic parts.
I really don't see what is stopping it from reaching relativistic speeds.
-Really big fuel source=check, there may be a greater density of interstellar medium than astronomers had previously believed
-Inertia=also check we are accelerating and decellerating slowly
-Impacts=accounted for. We actually WANT to encounter ions. I'm going to say that particles above the microscopic are probably so rare in the interstellar medium that planning for them is like planning for the eventually of tigers forming by quantum tunneling and attacking.
-Engine heat and efficiency= check using a magnetic engine 'piggy-backed' to a conventional fission reactor as a 'kickstarter' without moving parts could I imagine reach a very high efficiency
So why not 50% c ?
This engine could also be used to deflect larger (but still tiny) particles from impacting by generating a second powerful magnetic field.
The fusion engine pushes out ionized hydrogen, sucks in same, just like a jet engine except magnetic rather than using metallic parts.
I really don't see what is stopping it from reaching relativistic speeds.
-Really big fuel source=check, there may be a greater density of interstellar medium than astronomers had previously believed
-Inertia=also check we are accelerating and decellerating slowly
-Impacts=accounted for. We actually WANT to encounter ions. I'm going to say that particles above the microscopic are probably so rare in the interstellar medium that planning for them is like planning for the eventually of tigers forming by quantum tunneling and attacking.
-Engine heat and efficiency= check using a magnetic engine 'piggy-backed' to a conventional fission reactor as a 'kickstarter' without moving parts could I imagine reach a very high efficiency
So why not 50% c ?
Comment