Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
Every state in the US of which I'm aware has a statute allowing police to detain suspects for questioning, and to arrest suspects on "suspicion of" certain charges pending further investigation as to whether the suspect is chargeable with the underlying crime. On a "suspicion of" charge, there is a statutory time limit in which the suspect must either be charged with the underlying offense or released outright.
The charge was "suspicion of interfering with staff, faculty or students of an education institution."
Every state in the US of which I'm aware has a statute allowing police to detain suspects for questioning, and to arrest suspects on "suspicion of" certain charges pending further investigation as to whether the suspect is chargeable with the underlying crime. On a "suspicion of" charge, there is a statutory time limit in which the suspect must either be charged with the underlying offense or released outright.
The charge was "suspicion of interfering with staff, faculty or students of an education institution."
Interfering with staff, faculty or students of an education institution is a violation of Colorado statutory law. There's a question of fact as to whether the totality of his conduct meets the statutory requirement for interference, and there may or may not be a question of law as to whether that statutory requirement passes constitutional muster, but you don't know jack **** more than the rest of us what actually transpired.
Given what the police officer said (which should be biased against the kid), he was well within his rights.
Comment