Originally posted by DanS
I agree with this, but at least it's nice to see some actions being taken that are proactive rather than reactive. From an outsider's perspective, it seems like it has been quite a while since we have done anything proactive in Iraq, or even have had any notion of what to do. If telegraphing the moves had an impact in reducing the extreme violence of last year (several bombs killed scores a day in Baghdad), then that should be included in an evaluation of how effective Petraeus' leadership is.
One thing that I haven't really liked is seeing Petraeus spend so much time with the US/global media. But maybe he figures that he needs to take proactive steps there as well in order gain and maintain a mandate.
I agree with this, but at least it's nice to see some actions being taken that are proactive rather than reactive. From an outsider's perspective, it seems like it has been quite a while since we have done anything proactive in Iraq, or even have had any notion of what to do. If telegraphing the moves had an impact in reducing the extreme violence of last year (several bombs killed scores a day in Baghdad), then that should be included in an evaluation of how effective Petraeus' leadership is.
One thing that I haven't really liked is seeing Petraeus spend so much time with the US/global media. But maybe he figures that he needs to take proactive steps there as well in order gain and maintain a mandate.
Now that's funny. I'm trying to image the look on their faces when they learned their pay was being cut off. "Krap, now we're going to have to go out and get real jobs!
"
Comment