The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
1. If they're the same thing, then why two terms for the same thing?
2. Language derives value from its ability to communicate ideas between people. Using a word that has one specific meaning to a large group of people to mean something else that has meaning to a smaller group of people takes away much of that value and contributes little to the discourse.
<Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.
Originally posted by snoopy369
1. If they're the same thing, then why two terms for the same thing?
I'm not even going to answer this one.
2. Language derives value from its ability to communicate ideas between people. Using a word that has one specific meaning to a large group of people to mean something else that has meaning to a smaller group of people takes away much of that value and contributes little to the discourse.
The term wasn't just made up yesterday. "Freedom of conscience" was being used to describe the phenomenon well before "freedom of thought" was.
I dispute that they can be intrinsic to the nature of humanity if there are exceptions.
So for you, if the only instinsic aspects of the nature of humanity are those without exceptions you cannot accept anything as being part of human nature since everything you can think of will bound to have exceptions.
A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
Originally posted by MrFun
Since both of these are intrinsic to the nature of being human, these are natural rights rather than civil rights, correct?
Drop the natural/civil distinction, it doesn't work.
No one has any right to deprive of another person their right to their conscience and consciousness with the exception of criminals. They are to be imprisoned in violation of their free will for the safey of others.
What is that supposed to mean? and if we have have free will, we have free will in jail too.
Or, are there other situations or circumstances where one can deny another their right to conscience or consciousness with plausible moral and/or legal justification?
Explain what you mean with "denying the right to conscience".
Tweet
Comment