Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Don't mention the polar bears, Bush tells US scientists

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Don't mention the polar bears, Bush tells US scientists



    The Bush Administration has been accused once again of gagging US government scientists by getting them to agree not to talk about polar bears, sea ice and climate change during official overseas trips.

    A leaked memorandum issued by a regional director of the US Department of the Interior states that officials within the US Fish and Wildlife Service will limit their discussions when travelling in countries bordering the Arctic region because of sensitivities about climate change.

    "This traveller understands the administration's position on climate change, polar bears and sea ice and will not be speaking on or responding to these issues," says the memo from the regional director Richard Hannon to his boss, the director of the Fish and Wildlife Service.

    It is not the first time that US government officials have been accused to trying to gag scientists on climate change. James Hansen, the director of Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies and a world authority on the climate, complained last year that public relations officials appointed by the Bush Administration had tried to limit his access to the media.

    The memorandum from Mr Hannon was criticised by the Natural Resources Defence Council in Washington, which wants the US Department of Interior to list the polar bear as an endangered species because of the projected loss of sea ice in the Arctic over the coming century.

    "This memo has got to be put into the wider context of what President Bush has done to stifle debate on global warming over the last six years," said a council spokesman, Eben Burnham-Snyder. "The Bush Administration has a long history of restricting scientific discourse on global warming's impacts and solutions. This continued restriction hampers our experts' ability to do their job effectively and aggressively deal with our global warming challenge."

    A leaked e-mail from Mr Hannon to his staff warned that any future overseas trips involving or potentially involving climate change, sea ice or polar bears will require an official statement on who in the delegation will be the official spokesman.

    Any requests concerning foreign trips to Arctic countries such as Canada, Norway or Russia should also include "a statement of assurance that these individuals understand the Administration's position on these issues", particularly the topic of polar bears.

    Hugh Vickery, a spokes-man for the US Department of the Interior, said that the memorandum was "badly worded" and there was no intention of limiting informal discussions. The memo was intended to cover official bilateral talks where there is an agreed agenda and was an attempt to ensure that scientists stick to the areas within their remit, Mr Vickery said.

    "It's very important to know what the position of the United States government is on these issues. If two scientists want to talk over a coffee, that's fine. We want them to do that," he said. "But in an official capacity you need to know what your role is. This is not about gagging scientists. We don't want to do that."

    Mr Vickery added that polar bears and sea ice were mentioned in the memo because it was addressed to scientists within the Alaska region of the Fish and Wildlife Service.

    Arctic sea ice and the polar bear are especially sensitive issues at present because American scientists have pointed out that the world's biggest land carnivore is unlikely to survive if the Arctic sea ice disappears in summer, which it is predicted to do by the end of the century.

    The Department of Interior is currently engaged in a consultation over whether to list the species as endangered and a decision is expected by January 2008.


    Just another example of the Bush administration gagging scientists because the facts don't agree with Bush's beliefs.
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

  • #2
    Bush Administration Issues Another Gag Order on Global Warming

    Once again, the Bush administration has carefully controlled and even banned government employees from talking about global warming. In this latest incident of suppression, two memorandums written late February put strict limitations on what US Fish and Wildlife Service employees were allowed to discuss at conferences in Norway and Russia. A third memorandum extends the policy to Canada and “any northern country”.

    In short, representatives from the US whose job it is to conserve Arctic animals and plants are not allowed to discuss the number one threat to those species – global warming. After the memos were made public, the administration responded yesterday by claiming they were made to ensure US representatives “talk about only what’s on the agenda” of the meetings. The memos come just months after the Bush administration announced it would consider protecting declining populations of polar bears under the Endangered Species Act.

    “The polar bear has created a 24/7 forum for the U.S. government to be grilled about what its position is on global warming, and it’s really put the Bush administration in a tight, tight corner,” said Kieran Suckling of the Center for Biological Diversity, whose group sued over the animals. “It’s crazy to say, ‘The polar bear is endangered but we’re not going to do anything about global warming.’ They realize that message is so counterintuitive it cannot be delivered by anyone but the most seasoned hack available.”

    Because of the ban, experts have been relegated to simply discuss how to minimize dangerous interactions between humans and polar bears. In recent years, polar bears have been venturing closer to native villages as melting ice has changed their natural hunting patterns. Craig Perham, a biologist specializing in polar bears, was invited by the World Wildlife Fund to Siberia to help villagers minimize dangerous human-bear interactions. A memo on February 26th even made reference to Perham, saying he “understands the administration’s position on climate change, polar bears, and sea ice and will not be speaking on or responding to those issues.”
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

    Comment


    • #3
      What about all the children who live on shallow islands (that will eventually disappear as sea levels rise)? Aren't they more important/cute than polar bears?

      THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

      To us, it is the BEAST.

      Comment


      • #4
        I wouldn't expect it any other way.
        I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
        - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Sava
          THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
          I think it would be better if you posted a picture of white children.
          I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
          - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

          Comment


          • #6
            You are right.

            People care more about the polar bears because they are white.

            racism

            screw all the little macacas... let them drown! But let's save the snowy white bears!
            To us, it is the BEAST.

            Comment


            • #7
              Aryan bears
              I need a foot massage

              Comment


              • #8
                Have polar bears evolved since the Mediaeval Warm Period, or did they survive that even warmer time in our recent history? Just wondering.
                www.my-piano.blogspot

                Comment


                • #9
                  They survived though one suspects that the much smaller human population 600-800 years ago left more space and resources (I.E. food) for the bears.

                  In any even the main point is should politicians be allowed to gag scientists simply because sound science shows the politician's policies are wrong?
                  Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Oerdin
                    They survived though one suspects that the much smaller human population 600-800 years ago left more space and resources (I.E. food) for the bears.

                    In any even the main point is should politicians be allowed to gag scientists simply because sound science shows the politician's policies are wrong?
                    No, scientists should not be gagged. But your article seemed to focus more heavily on polar bears so I responded to that part.
                    www.my-piano.blogspot

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Sava
                      What about all the children who live on shallow islands (that will eventually disappear as sea levels rise)? Aren't they more important/cute than polar bears?
                      No.

                      THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
                      **** them. We have man eating (white) omnivores to care about.
                      (\__/)
                      (='.'=)
                      (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'm not irritated by much, but Bush's war on science really ticks me off.
                        APOSTOLNIK BEANIE BERET BICORNE BIRETTA BOATER BONNET BOWLER CAP CAPOTAIN CHADOR COIF CORONET CROWN DO-RAG FEDORA FEZ GALERO HAIRNET HAT HEADSCARF HELMET HENNIN HIJAB HOOD KABUTO KERCHIEF KOLPIK KUFI MITRE MORTARBOARD PERUKE PICKELHAUBE SKULLCAP SOMBRERO SHTREIMEL STAHLHELM STETSON TIARA TOQUE TOUPEE TRICORN TRILBY TURBAN VISOR WIG YARMULKE ZUCCHETTO

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Perfection
                          I'm not irritated by much, but Bush's war on science really ticks me off.
                          I heard he has increased investment in it rapidly?
                          www.my-piano.blogspot

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            They survived though one suspects that the much smaller human population 600-800 years ago left more space and resources (I.E. food) for the bears.
                            Urban spawl hits the Arctic?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Doddler


                              I heard he has increased investment in it rapidly?
                              Probably crap science like creationist stuff, the dickhead.
                              APOSTOLNIK BEANIE BERET BICORNE BIRETTA BOATER BONNET BOWLER CAP CAPOTAIN CHADOR COIF CORONET CROWN DO-RAG FEDORA FEZ GALERO HAIRNET HAT HEADSCARF HELMET HENNIN HIJAB HOOD KABUTO KERCHIEF KOLPIK KUFI MITRE MORTARBOARD PERUKE PICKELHAUBE SKULLCAP SOMBRERO SHTREIMEL STAHLHELM STETSON TIARA TOQUE TOUPEE TRICORN TRILBY TURBAN VISOR WIG YARMULKE ZUCCHETTO

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X