Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Logic Problem!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by KrazyHorse
    My ranking of you was obviously justified.
    I'm pretty sure you got Krill wrong though.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Oncle Boris
      P: Everyday this week I have $10 in my pocket
      But it doesn't say that, it says if I have $10 in my pocket.
      Speaking of Erith:

      "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

      Comment


      • #78
        re: KH

        At first glance, it could appear that the 'every day this week' only applies to the first statement, and that the conditioned meant something like "I will eat lunch at KFC [at some later time]", in which case the answer is E.
        In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by Provost Harrison


          But it doesn't say that, it says if I have $10 in my pocket.
          No, PH. The 'if...then' is an operator.
          In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

          Comment


          • #80
            That is not in dispute, but the problem is you need to know the condition of one to know the other on any given day.
            Speaking of Erith:

            "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

            Comment


            • #81
              You're not making any sense...
              In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

              Comment


              • #82
                I've explained it earlier - I'm not rehashing it.
                Speaking of Erith:

                "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                Comment


                • #83
                  If you've never done any formal logic, I can understand your confusion. But if you actually have, I'm worried.
                  In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    I've never done any, but from my interpretation of the question, that is what it is saying...
                    Speaking of Erith:

                    "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      OK, that's what I thought.

                      KH would probably explain it better, but since he's obviously intent on being an ass, I'll tell you what's wrong.

                      The question gives you the following information: that "Every day this week, if I have $10 in my pocket, then I will eat lunch at KFC" is a false statement.

                      Don't bother with "real-life" thinking. This is formal. You're looking for something you can assuredly infer from this information.

                      The sentence can be decomposed in two basic statements: P: "every day this week I have $10 in my pocket" and Q: "every day this week I have lunch at KFC". The "if...then" is an operator, just like AND, OR, etc. This is why it's not part of either P or Q, it's only linking them.

                      Now that you know that the implication between the two is false, you can infer the truth value of P and Q. What "P then Q is false" means is that you've got P but not Q.
                      Of all the choices, D is the only one that's necessarily true if Q is false.
                      In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Colon™
                        A very cute employee gave me a free coke at a KFC once. Idiotic as I was, I didn't realise free cokes weren't part of regular service.
                        Once you figured it out, were you able to find your way back to that same KFC?

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by Oncle Boris
                          OK, that's what I thought.

                          KH would probably explain it better, but since he's obviously intent on being an ass, I'll tell you what's wrong.

                          The question gives you the following information: that "Every day this week, if I have $10 in my pocket, then I will eat lunch at KFC" is a false statement.

                          Don't bother with "real-life" thinking. This is formal. You're looking for something you can assuredly infer from this information.

                          The sentence can be decomposed in two basic statements: P: "every day this week I have $10 in my pocket" and Q: "every day this week I have lunch at KFC". The "if...then" is an operator, just like AND, OR, etc. This is why it's not part of either P or Q, it's only linking them.

                          Now that you know that the implication between the two is false, you can infer the truth value of P and Q. What "P then Q is false" means is that you've got P but not Q.
                          Of all the choices, D is the only one that's necessarily true if Q is false.
                          It still doesn't make sense how you have made that inference from that information, if this is one of those esoteric types of question...well...
                          Speaking of Erith:

                          "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            We know ~(P -> Q). The only way we can know that is if we have a counterexample, that is, if we know P ^ ~Q. D is ~Q.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Yeah, and that really helped
                              Speaking of Erith:

                              "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Okay, here is the truth table for an individual day:

                                Let P = "I have $10" and Q = "I eat at KFC."

                                Code:
                                P | Q | P -> Q
                                --------------
                                T | T | T
                                T | F | F
                                F | T | T
                                F | F | T
                                That is, P -> Q is true as long as ~(P ^ ~Q), that is, as long as we don't have an example of me having $10 but not eating at KFC. For P -> Q to be false, it must be P ^ ~Q at least one day, which means it must be ~Q at least one day, which is D.

                                Comment

                                Working...