The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
At first glance, it could appear that the 'every day this week' only applies to the first statement, and that the conditioned meant something like "I will eat lunch at KFC [at some later time]", in which case the answer is E.
KH would probably explain it better, but since he's obviously intent on being an ass, I'll tell you what's wrong.
The question gives you the following information: that "Every day this week, if I have $10 in my pocket, then I will eat lunch at KFC" is a false statement.
Don't bother with "real-life" thinking. This is formal. You're looking for something you can assuredly infer from this information.
The sentence can be decomposed in two basic statements: P: "every day this week I have $10 in my pocket" and Q: "every day this week I have lunch at KFC". The "if...then" is an operator, just like AND, OR, etc. This is why it's not part of either P or Q, it's only linking them.
Now that you know that the implication between the two is false, you can infer the truth value of P and Q. What "P then Q is false" means is that you've got P but not Q.
Of all the choices, D is the only one that's necessarily true if Q is false.
Originally posted by Colon™
A very cute employee gave me a free coke at a KFC once. Idiotic as I was, I didn't realise free cokes weren't part of regular service.
Once you figured it out, were you able to find your way back to that same KFC?
Originally posted by Oncle Boris
OK, that's what I thought.
KH would probably explain it better, but since he's obviously intent on being an ass, I'll tell you what's wrong.
The question gives you the following information: that "Every day this week, if I have $10 in my pocket, then I will eat lunch at KFC" is a false statement.
Don't bother with "real-life" thinking. This is formal. You're looking for something you can assuredly infer from this information.
The sentence can be decomposed in two basic statements: P: "every day this week I have $10 in my pocket" and Q: "every day this week I have lunch at KFC". The "if...then" is an operator, just like AND, OR, etc. This is why it's not part of either P or Q, it's only linking them.
Now that you know that the implication between the two is false, you can infer the truth value of P and Q. What "P then Q is false" means is that you've got P but not Q.
Of all the choices, D is the only one that's necessarily true if Q is false.
It still doesn't make sense how you have made that inference from that information, if this is one of those esoteric types of question...well...
Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith
Okay, here is the truth table for an individual day:
Let P = "I have $10" and Q = "I eat at KFC."
Code:
P | Q | P -> Q
--------------
T | T | T
T | F | F
F | T | T
F | F | T
That is, P -> Q is true as long as ~(P ^ ~Q), that is, as long as we don't have an example of me having $10 but not eating at KFC. For P -> Q to be false, it must be P ^ ~Q at least one day, which means it must be ~Q at least one day, which is D.
Comment