Leftist youth groups conduct street battles with police in Copenhagen

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Arrian
Oh, so if they arrest someone and you agree with them it's not violence, but if they arrest someone and you agree with the "criminal" then it's violence.

-Arrian

It's violent if it is oppressive.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Flubber



THat would be wrong to me-- If there was an assault on a person


But the Christians could not "break into " a house that they own-- plus wasn't this a pretty free and open centre that people could just walk into. I don't have visions of locked doors

You can not walk into a house that you own until the occupants are evicted Mr. Law. And they Broke in. Yes the doors were locked.

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Arrian


I must've missed that part. Can you point me to the recap of that event?

Incidently, can the owner of a building "break in" ? If I'm renting and my landlord comes in w/o my consent I guess it would be "breaking in" or somesuch... hmm.

-Arrian

Landlords should have a key but they are only ( in most jurisdictions I have seen) entitled to use it in an "emergency" or on proper notice during normal business hours (or similar wording)

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Arrian


And people wonder why folks like Flubber and I prefer the police...

-Arrian

Really? I don't

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Kidicious


I don't think it was drafted that way. I don't know why the activists would claim that the council couldn't buy back.

IN a normal sale when something is sold its gone and there are no buyback rights-- So frankly I have no idea what the activist is referencing

[ZEE]

kid has resorted to one liners again. its the only way he can possibly defend his left-wing comministic cult stance. why do you keep dragging this out kid? for attention?

[Arrian]

Originally posted by Kidicious

Really? I don't

I had gathered that.

-Arrian

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Flubber


IN a normal sale when something is sold its gone and there are no buyback rights-- So frankly I have no idea what the activist is referencing

In this case, understandably, the council did not want the building to fall into political opponents of the activists. So they made a buy back agreement.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Arrian


I had gathered that.

-Arrian

I don't have much need for police since I have no property and I don't care about using them such as the way that Faderhuset has used them here.

[ZEE]

Originally posted by Kidicious


I don't have much need for police

you have just warped so far into KID-LAND i dont believe there is ANY possible way for you to return to the planet Earth. If you are being robbed and beaten by hooligans, you will sure love some police to show up to help you.

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Kidicious


I don't care what you think of their cause. I do know that you want to have a nice economic and political system where you can make money without any threats and conflict like this. So we fight you.

Actually I would like a system where everyone can have a minimum standard of living and but where people can improve their position through work and skill. I do want a safe place for me and my children-- I don't deny that.

I have no intention of figting anybody and would only "fight" to protect my family

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Kidicious


It's violent if it is oppressive.

and I'm sure it is YOU that defines what is oppressive. You could probably make an argument that the arrest of the guy that steals my watch is oppressive.

[lord of the mark]

Originally posted by Arrian


I must've missed that part. Can you point me to the recap of that event?

Incidently, can the owner of a building "break in" ? If I'm renting and my landlord comes in w/o my consent I guess it would be "breaking in" or somesuch... hmm.

-Arrian

depends on the terms of your lease. If you are renting without a lease, it would depend on local real estate law, I guess.

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Kidicious


In this case, understandably, the council did not want the building to fall into political opponents of the activists. So they made a buy back agreement.

Thats unusual in itself. The city shouldn't care.

But obviously they didn't make a very good buyback arrangement if it were sidestepped by the simple use of a dummy corporation. THats not even hard to do.

[Arrian]

We know the motivations of the city council now, too?

I went back a re-read the articles posted in the OP... I saw no references to:

1) any invasion/assault by the Christian group on the activists pre-trial; or

2) the motivation of the city council wrt the buy-back

So where are you getting that from? I'm honestly curious.

I don't have much need for police since I have no property and I don't care about using them such as the way that Faderhuset has used them here.

Police aren't *just* there to protect property (though that's certainly a big part of it). They also help with, you know, murder, rape, etc.

-Arrian