It's official: atheistic fundamentalism exists.

[Robert]

You read the 2nd part of my message, didn't you?
And yes, like I said, in most of the Old Testament books there's no problem with polytheism. But it's not as if the Bible explicetly allows polygamy. I think you don't understand my point, my point is that if it would be a man-inspired book it would be more male supporting, by in example (just an example) give more rights to males ie. to marry many wives.

The Bible does condemn polygamy implicitly btw. In all cases of polygamy in the Bible, the polygamy results in disasters.

[Jon Miller]

Yeah... the Bible doesn't just show things going right. It shows a lot of things going wrong also.

It shows complete stories, not just tales of people to idealize.

JM

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Tacc
That does not, however, mean atheism is a religion or that the atheist cannot have a moral system independent and dissimilar to religion.

I think we agree that that which you call their moral system does not involve any moral values that they believe are universally true.

[Perfection]

CyberShy , don't threadjack your own thread, please address my points about atheism not being a religion

[Heresson]

lets talk about nostrils

[Perfection]

Originally posted by Heresson
lets talk about nostrils

Can't, Ming will rape me.

[Imran Siddiqui]

In the nostril?

[LordShiva]

[Heresson]

Originally posted by Perfection
Can't, Ming will rape me.

we need to have younger mods...

[LordShiva]

Well, Solver is a pimply teenager.

[Heresson]

...and attractive. Some girls should be in.

[Nubclear]

Originally posted by Perfection
CyberShy , don't threadjack your own thread, please address my points about atheism not being a religion

CyberShy has been utterly pwnd in that area of the debate.
Hence, it is being moved away from that.

[Perfection]

Originally posted by Tacc


CyberShy has been utterly pwnd in that area of the debate.
Hence, it is being moved away from that.

Ah, but I want admnission of defeat or continued debate, and I'll harp about it until it happens!

[Elok]

Hmm, I read this as "aesthetic fundamentalism" at first, and envisioned a Martha Stewart personality cult. That would have been more interesting...

[GePap]

Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Context for those unfamiliar with the most recent example:

Originally posted by GePap
1. Given that there is no set of rules regulating space weapons as of today, anyone can put anything in space. That includes weapons systems.

Was the basis of his argument.

This was posted several posts after I had directly quoted the wikipedia article on the Outer Space Treaty.

You mean this thread:

http://apolyton.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=161802&perpage=25&pagenumber=7

When did two posts, writen 1 minute apart become "several"?

Is this you being correct on the technicalities?

Oh, and if anyone goes back to that thread, they can freely read the last post I wrote, which pretty much laid bare how lazy and vapid your "arguement" was, of course, there was no real arguement.

But then, with you, there never is.