Tweet
Can you provide an example of a mechanism for FTL transmission of information without breaking one of the other two?
-
-
Apart from inflation, which doesn't afaik let you get anywhere new FTL.Comment
-
Yes.Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Can you provide an example of a mechanism for FTL transmission of information without breaking one of the other two?12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio RegumComment
-
Elaborate.Comment
-
Never!"I may not agree with what you have to say, but I'll die defending your right to say it." — Voltaire
"Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart." — ConfuciusComment
-
Not you.Comment
-
Your reasons being?Originally posted by KrazyHorse
No, not necessarily. But thanks for playing.APOSTOLNIK BEANIE BERET BICORNE BIRETTA BOATER BONNET BOWLER CAP CAPOTAIN CHADOR COIF CORONET CROWN DO-RAG FEDORA FEZ GALERO HAIRNET HAT HEADSCARF HELMET HENNIN HIJAB HOOD KABUTO KERCHIEF KOLPIK KUFI MITRE MORTARBOARD PERUKE PICKELHAUBE SKULLCAP SOMBRERO SHTREIMEL STAHLHELM STETSON TIARA TOQUE TOUPEE TRICORN TRILBY TURBAN VISOR WIG YARMULKE ZUCCHETTOComment
-
Infinite Improbability Drive FTW!
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
Iain Banks missed deadline due to Civ | The eyes are the groin of the head. - Dwight Schrute.
One more turn .... One more turn .... | WWTSD
Comment
-
I'm aware of relativity.Originally posted by Lul Thyme
Well, it's called the theory of relativity and has been successfully tested many times at different levels, including accelerating massive objects to very near light speed (which is what we're discussing) with energies required following theoretical predictions up to experimental error.
You may argue that this is not proof, and while technically right, it is as "true" as anything can be in physical science and there is a lot more evidence for that than your ideas.
Maybe you can explain to us how your Theory of Invisible Fast Objects work, what testable predictions it makes that differ from accepted physics and we can check.
If you are moving faster than light can travel, then you will be outside its boundries, thus it will appear invisible to us; because light must be touching the object in order for us to see it.
However, whether it becomes invisible or pure black, I'm not sure.be freeComment
-
No you're not aware of relativity."Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-BokononComment
-
It's not clear to me why information transfer faster than light is not allowed by Lorentz/Einstein. Mass moving faster than light sure. But there's no "information" in E=mc^2.Comment
-
There's two kinds of relativity.Originally posted by TCO
But there's no "information" in E=mc^2.THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTFComment
-
Look more closely at the Lorentz transformation. If you can transmit image faster than light, you can send it back in time (by changing your frame of reference). Relativity breaks simultaneity.Originally posted by TCO
It's not clear to me why information transfer faster than light is not allowed by Lorentz/Einstein. Mass moving faster than light sure. But there's no "information" in E=mc^2.Comment
-
Can't you use quantum computing to transfer data via electron spin, or something?You just wasted six ... no, seven ... seconds of your life reading this sentence.Comment
-
Quantum entanglement does not transmit information.Comment
Comment