Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What defence do we have against politically-motivated scientists?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Ari Rahikkala
    What defense do we have against scientifically-motivated scientists and politicians?
    Scientific-based policy is noy too much of a problem so long as people know what they are voting for; the problem lies in trusting scientists who may be trying to pervert policy for their own ideologies through their politically-determined studies.
    www.my-piano.blogspot

    Comment


    • #17
      What defence do we have against politically-motivated scientists?


      Give Big Oil more money so that they can fight the lies with the scientific truth and their political championing of it.
      One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

      Comment


      • #18
        Profit is a smaller threat than ideology.
        www.my-piano.blogspot

        Comment


        • #19
          There are plenty of scientists to go around, so there will always be some scientists who will question the recommendations of the biased scientists. Heck, there will always be some scientists who will question even good solid findings. It is the duty of both sides to intelligently present their case(s) in a manner suitable to the general public. It should be the duty of the media to convey those arguements to the public.

          Was there something you specifically had in mind?
          "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

          Comment


          • #20
            Basically, Spink is worried that reality is biased against his opinions.
            "On this ship you'll refer to me as idiot, not you captain!"
            - Lone Star

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Bosh
              Park Avenue you're our only hope! Save us from the smart people!
              Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
                There are plenty of scientists to go around, so there will always be some scientists who will question the recommendations of the biased scientists. Heck, there will always be some scientists who will question even good solid findings. It is the duty of both sides to intelligently present their case(s) in a manner suitable to the general public. It should be the duty of the media to convey those arguements to the public.
                Exactly. It's the whole purpose of peer reviewing - people are free to challenge it and test it. It's what keeps scientists honest.
                Smile
                For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
                But he would think of something

                "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

                Comment


                • #23
                  I find politically motivated ignorants way more dangerous.
                  Ich bin der Zorn Gottes. Wer sonst ist mit mir?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Jaakko
                    Basically, Spink is worried that reality is biased against his opinions.
                    The enemy cannot push a button if you disable his hand.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Jaakko
                      Basically, Spink is worried that reality is biased against his opinions.
                      Jaakko sighting +1
                      This is Shireroth, and Giant Squid will brutally murder me if I ever remove this link from my signature | In the end it won't be love that saves us, it will be mathematics | So many people have this concept of God the Avenger. I see God as the ultimate sense of humor -- SlowwHand

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Jaakko
                        Basically, Spink is worried that reality is biased against his opinions.


                        Unfortunately our society is all to often run by idiots
                        "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: What defence do we have against politically-motivated scientists?

                          Originally posted by Park Avenue
                          What defence do we have against politically-motivated scientists?
                          Peer review.
                          THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
                          AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
                          AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
                          DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Unfortunately our society is run by idiots
                            fixed

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              If they are politically motivated, they are not true scientists
                              So get your Naomi Klein books and move it or I'll seriously bash your faces in! - Supercitizen to stupid students
                              Be kind to the nerdiest guy in school. He will be your boss when you've grown up!

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Re: What defence do we have against politically-motivated scientists?

                                Originally posted by LordShiva
                                Peer review.
                                True...as far as it goes.

                                But Park Avenue might be one to something. Usually, scientists perform experiments which can be peer-reviewed by other scientists. I can remember the great break through in "cold fusion" in the late 80's, which crumbled when other scientists were unable to get the same results in their laboratories.

                                But what about when scientists are making projections? Someone above mentioned global warming, which is an okay example for the purposes of our discussion.

                                There's plenty of evidence that the globe is, on average, heating up. I'm with the majority who thinks that this is due, a least in large part, to human actions. Others though, think we're observing just a natural cycle. How can other scientist check these theories in their labs?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X