The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Actually, arrogance, smugness and insufferable moral superiority seems to be a trait mostly found among Canadians
Oh, you, get out of the closet already...
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
And I'd be perfectly happy to sell a brownish beverage and call it Coca-Cola. However, that name has a reputation (that costed millions upon millions to build over the years), and I just can't do it like that.
Sorry, but I can see the difference between a trademark and a word in the common vocabulary.
Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Sorry, but I can see the difference between a trademark and a word in the common vocabulary.
you see, in the advance european civilization, words and specific products are protected from capitalism
the same is happening with products like the Greek Feta (or french wine, etc) where companies not using the original way of manufacturing are prohibited from calling their white cheeses "feta" so that the consumer is not fooled.
Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Who the **** are you to tell a bakery what they're supposed to sell?
If it's safe and conforms to whatever process they claim the bread is made by then why the hell does the government feel like sticking its big nose in there?
it's thinking like this that have us ending up reading at the footer of the Pizza Hut menu: "chicken used on the pizzas refers to product based on chicken. beaf refers to product based on beaf." (it's true, just look it up(or rather, down))
words and specific products are protected from capitalism
Actually, it looks to me as though you've allowed a small group of capitalists to monopolise the word.
It's all the negatives of capitalism with none of the benefits.
YAY!!!
I'm beginning to see why Europe is turning into such a ****hole.
I'm also beginning to see why Americans think that "socialism" is inefficient. They think Europe is socialist. It's not. It's run by ****ing guilds. It's the medieval bourgeoisie all over again.
Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead
Not only have you decided what "boulangerie" means according to some Frenchy pseudo-cultured sense, but you've also decided to enforce your view in law.
I don't know about you, but I'd be perfectly happy to have an electronics store call itself a boulangerie.
I guess if you can't face the modern world it's always possible to close your eyes and claim the cultural high ground.
Would you be fine with companies selling "Bier" in Germany that didn't meet the statards of the Purity Law?
Sorry, but I can see the difference between a trademark and a word in the common vocabulary.
Well in France, they have an institution to define words too
"The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists."
-Joan Robinson
Originally posted by MarkG
you see, in the advance european civilization, words and specific products are protected from capitalism
the same is happening with products like the Greek Feta (or french wine, etc) where companies not using the original way of manufacturing are prohibited from calling their white cheeses "feta" so that the consumer is not fooled.
Yes, but that's a product. You buy "feta" and taste something more like rotten parmesan, you're going to be very unhappy. I approve of laws regulating what you can call certain types of food; for example, if a food does not contain the leaves of Camellia sinensis, I do not believe it should be legal to call it "tea." It's annoying as hell to ask for tea and get some smarmy potpourri-water BS. If they refuse to label that crap as "potpourri-water," "tisane" will do as well, but it's not freaking tea if it has no tea leaves in it. Grr. Anyway, to get back on-topic, it's inexcusable to have to pay for crappy products under a false impression, but unless French bakeries charge admission or something like that the main consequence of entering a faux-langerie is disillusionment.
Perhaps if a Frenchman walks into a "boulangerie" and discovers that they do not sell hand-baked bread, only the machine-made kind, he will be apoplectic with rage and will be able to sue the owners, or the state, for emotional damages somehow. Perhaps he will think, "Zut, this boulangerie does not sell handmade bread? Well then, all boulangeries must be the same way! I spit upon boulangeries in my disdainful French fashion. Ptah! From now on I will eat only pita and German pumpernickel!"
Perhaps he will. I don't know. It'd make more sense if he just said "pshht" and stopped frequenting the place in question. It's what I'd do if I encountered a store that put on airs but sold inferior products. This is just a weird, neurotic regulation, albeit pretty much harmless. Now, if the "boulangerie" sells "herb tea," I don't object to the owner getting shot in the crotch with rock salt. But that's another story.
Comment