Tweet
This must be one of the most absurd threads EVER on DU
Read the posts by the poster "NoMoreMyths" if you want a good laugh.
Read the posts by the poster "NoMoreMyths" if you want a good laugh.
-
-
No.To us, it is the BEAST. -
Yes.blehComment
-
Here, let me compose a really idiotic thread so then someone here can go post it on another forum and go "OMGOMG" and then have other people go "hahah yeah, that person is a moron for having an opinion I don't agree with LOLOL"
mmmm
nah, I'm just going to go to bed...To us, it is the BEAST.Comment
-
Sava, quit being an *******.
Comment
-
Why should only the cute animals get protection from evil scientists?Comment
-
I think the bugs I encountered during my study of biology
would have been glad if levitating had been the only thing done to them
Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"Comment
-
No.Originally posted by Odin
Sava, quit being an *******.
To us, it is the BEAST.Comment
-
Wrong.Originally posted by Whoha
Why should only the cute animals get protection from evil scientists?
Why should any animal get protection from evil human-hating insectists?Comment
-
Yikes. Bug life = human life. That's as crazy as the God Hate Fags church.I'm about to get aroused from watching the pokemon and that's awesome. - PekkaComment
-
Because they're cute.Originally posted by Whoha
Why should only the cute animals get protection from evil scientists?
I could understand (but disagree with) objecting to experimenting on animals from the Jainist "all life is sacred" angle, but not from the "it's okay to kill a mouse with a mousetrap, but it's not okay to kill a mouse with an experimental cancer treatment" angle. If it's okay for Joe Blow to squash bugs and slaughter mice, then what's the problem with scientists doing the same thing?<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures
</p>Comment
-
I'm just afraid that one day the bugs may strike back
BlahComment
-
I'm pointing out that he is atleast being consistent.Originally posted by Cort Haus
Wrong.
Why should any animal get protection from evil human-hating insectists?Comment
-
He's not, though. He's not pro-life, he's just anti-science -- he says that it's okay to squash bugs, it's just not okay to squash bugs in the name of science.<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>Comment
-
WTF is DU?THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTFComment
Comment