Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does 1+1 = 2?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Q Cubed
    Yeah, she told me you liked being caned.
    Only by her. Don't get any ideas
    THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
    AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
    AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
    DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by LordShiva


      Only by her. Don't get any ideas
      I'm not some kind of pervert like you or JP.
      B♭3

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by MikeH
        On average though, it equals 2.
        But are we talking about 1 or 0.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 999999999999999999999999999999999999?
        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

        Comment


        • #34
          Different thread.
          Why doing it the easy way if it is possible to do it complicated?

          Comment


          • #35
            Yes, but this is a take off of that thread so it belongs here too.
            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Q Cubed
              I'm not some kind of pervert like you or JP.
              What kind of pervert are you, then?
              THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
              AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
              AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
              DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by BeBro
                Damn liberal math types, everyone has another answer

                It's called "Freedom," BeBor. It's what America is all about. No longer are we shackled by the outmoded restrictions of the Old World. Everyone is his own al Jebra!

                Comment


                • #38
                  yeah wouldn't it equal 1.99999999999998 ?
                  Learn to overcome the crass demands of flesh and bone, for they warp the matrix through which we perceive the world. Extend your awareness outward, beyond the self of body, to embrace the self of group and the self of humanity. The goals of the group and the greater race are transcendant, and to embrace them is to acheive enlightenment.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I'm glad mathematics isn't a democracy.
                    "Every time I have to make a tough decision, I ask myself, 'What would Tom Cruise do?' Then I jump up and down on the couch." - Neil Strauss

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Pekka
                      Here's another one...

                      We agree that a set can include itself.

                      So A = {A, B, C, D} for example.


                      So is A bigger than A, or is A = A, as a set?

                      This be called Russell's paradox.

                      No wait, maybe I'm remembering wrong, maybe this was some other paradox.. oh well.
                      Wow, that's the worst mangling of Russell's paradox I've ever seen . Allowing sets to contain themselves is, IIRC, perfectly consistent. Russell's paradox really has to do with the inconsistency of having a set of all sets.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Lazerus
                        yeah wouldn't it equal 1.99999999999998 ?
                        According to idiots that think .9 repeating equals one.
                        USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!
                        The video may avatar is from

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          1 + 1 = .II...

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by civman2000

                            Wow, that's the worst mangling of Russell's paradox I've ever seen . Allowing sets to contain themselves is, IIRC, perfectly consistent. Russell's paradox really has to do with the inconsistency of having a set of all sets.
                            thats cause set of sets is called a match
                            "I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
                            'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Banana

                              I vote Banana.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                According to conspiracy theorists, nothing really adds up.
                                So, "1+1=2" is simply another answer provided by the people who rule the world, and therefore, prima facie, false.
                                No matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai
                                "I played it [Civilization] for three months and then realised I hadn't done any work. In the end, I had to delete all the saved files and smash the CD." Iain Banks, author

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X