Are You Ready for Some Football

[MRT144]

im about to go shopping today, but I was wondering if you could look up 3 stats.

sacks allowed, draft position, and qb rating of each starting qb for each team

[SlowwHand]

If I had nothing to do, I'd be too busy to do all your homework.

[Lord Avalon]

Originally posted by OzzyKP

Plus since Arizona hasn't played this week yet, Detroit is 2-9 and AZ is 2-8, so Detroit has the worst record.

So yea, for the moment Detroit is unquestionably the worst team in the NFL. And as I pessimistically stated, they'll probably win just enough games to deny themselves a good pick. Proving that they can't even lose right.

Ozzy, I think you're being overly pessimistic. If Detroit can't beat SF at home, and a formerly 1-win AZ team (even if it was on the road), what makes you think they can win any of these? @NE, MN, @GB, Chi, @ Dallas. I'm just not seeing it. They already played their Any Given Sunday card against Atl.

AZ has NO, @ Wash, @TB, Dallas, Car, @ Philly. Not much better, but Philly lost McNabb, and they've already beaten Detroit.

Oak is currently the other 2-win team. They have @SD, Hou, @Cincy, St.Lou, KC, @NYJ. Maybe they can beat Hou. They already beat AZ (if head-to-head actually means anything for 1st pick).

[reismark]

I don't know what the hell is making you think Arizona plays Tampa Bay. I wish we were playing the Cardinals this year, as it would be a welcome respite from the hell we've had to go through, but our remaining schedule looks like this:

@Pit, Atl, @Chi, @Cle, Sea

Yikes.

[Dis]

Originally posted by MRT144
im about to go shopping today, but I was wondering if you could look up 3 stats.

sacks allowed, draft position, and qb rating of each starting qb for each team

shopping? how gay.

only crazy people and women (women are crazy though) go shopping the day after thanksgiving.

[OzzyKP]

Originally posted by Lord Avalon

Ozzy, I think you're being overly pessimistic. If Detroit can't beat SF at home, and a formerly 1-win AZ team (even if it was on the road), what makes you think they can win any of these? @NE, MN, @GB, Chi, @ Dallas. I'm just not seeing it. They already played their Any Given Sunday card against Atl.

AZ has NO, @ Wash, @TB, Dallas, Car, @ Philly. Not much better, but Philly lost McNabb, and they've already beaten Detroit.

Oak is currently the other 2-win team. They have @SD, Hou, @Cincy, St.Lou, KC, @NYJ. Maybe they can beat Hou. They already beat AZ (if head-to-head actually means anything for 1st pick).

Well looking at their remaining schedule, perhaps you're right. But the Lions have a funny way of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

It doesn't matter anyways. We'll still pick some high profile WR who won't perform and will end up cut from the team in 2-3 years.

[Lord Avalon]

Originally posted by reismark
I don't know what the hell is making you think Arizona plays Tampa Bay. I wish we were playing the Cardinals this year, as it would be a welcome respite from the hell we've had to go through, but our remaining schedule looks like this:

@Pit, Atl, @Chi, @Cle, Sea

Yikes.

D'OH! I was looking at Atlanta's remaining schedule.

AZ remaining schedule @MN, @StL, Sea, Den, @SF, @SD. So maybe they could get another win @SF?

[SlowwHand]

No. SF is improving. Gore & Company. Minnesota is a better chance for a win.

[Lord Avalon]

Wow! Atlanta gave up a 48-yd Hail Mary TD at the end of the first half!

What do you do? [/Chris Berman]
Knock it down! [/Tom Jackson]

Except it looked like Hall tried to catch it. Dumbass. He mistimed his jump and missed, Copper timed it right and caught it.

21-6. Despite Vick setting a record for 1st half rushing by a QB with 127 yds.

[SlowwHand]

Vick is a hell of a RB.
M. Vick 7/15 44 yards. He sure as **** can't throw.

SF's first pick in draft needs to be someone on defense that can help stop the run.

[snoopy369]

Originally posted by MRT144


you should read a book by Michael Lewis called "the blind side" which tackles the left tackle position and how it has evolved due to bill walsh's strategy (also know as the west coast offense which is a misnomer considering EVERYONE USES IT since its so effective!)

The west coast offense is not used by every team in the league. It's used by some, but not by nearly all of the teams in the NFL. I think only four or five teams use a true Bill Walsh offense.

It is VERY hard to use, albeit effective if you have the right skill positions, particularly the QB. The QB must be very skilled at quick passes to a spot in the field, and the WRs must run routes VERY well.

The misnomer comes from the fact that Kosar described a "West Coast Offense" that referred to the early 80's Chargers and Raiders, not to the Walsh offense in the mid to late 80s. Walsh's success led to the name being applied to his offense.

[MRT144]

Originally posted by snoopy369


The west coast offense is not used by every team in the league. It's used by some, but not by nearly all of the teams in the NFL. I think only four or five teams use a true Bill Walsh offense.

It is VERY hard to use, albeit effective if you have the right skill positions, particularly the QB. The QB must be very skilled at quick passes to a spot in the field, and the WRs must run routes VERY well.

The misnomer comes from the fact that Kosar described a "West Coast Offense" that referred to the early 80's Chargers and Raiders, not to the Walsh offense in the mid to late 80s. Walsh's success led to the name being applied to his offense.

you sir need to read "the blind side" to see how wrong you are.

[SlowwHand]

What makes a "West Coast Offense" is using 3-step drops by the QB, rather than 7.

The off-tackle has much less to do with it than with traditional 7 step.
I just figured, let him ramble.

[MRT144]

he got about half of it, but the skill positions is highly innaccurate because if executed it can take bad QBs and make them better.

[Lord Avalon]

Buf kicks last sec FG to beat Jax 27-24.