Democrats go on offensive with new TV Ad

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by SlowwHand
It wasn't under Bush that jobs started going overseas.
It wasn't under Bush that terrorism got their foothold.
That was under Clinton.

Actually, that was under Reagan.

[Admiral]

This is a race that should force us to rexamine so-called "common knowledge." Things which are no longer true:

Republicans no longer have an advantage on national security. Conventional wisdom in Washington is that if the Republicans make this election about National Security, they win. Republicans even launched a major ad campaign to try to do just that. The thing is, this isn't backed up by polling. Currently, the Democrats have a slight advantage on National Security. But more importantly, Iraq is National Security, and the Democrats have a big whopping advantage on Iraq. And short of Osama bin Laden appearing in US custody in the next two weeks, I'm not sure there is much that can change.

Democrats do have an agenda. Recently, the Dems came out with both a plan called "six in 06 ," and the agenda for their "first 100 hours ." And in a recent Newsweek Poll, a majority of Americans supported this agenda.

[Tuberski]

So, the Democrats are ripping off The Daily Show, who did it better?

ACK!

[Whoha]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara


Actually, that was under Reagan.

actually it happened even eariler then that.

[SlowwHand]

It's an honor for me today to be joined by my
predecessor, President Bush, who took the major steps in negotiating
this North American Free Trade Agreement;

REMARKS BY PRESIDENT CLINTON
IN SIGNING OF NAFTA SIDE AGREEMENTS
For Immediate Release September 14, 1993

[Imran Siddiqui]

Clinton had to get it passed though, which Bush couldn't get the votes for.

[SlowwHand]

Whatever Imran. So now you even correct Clinton. Ok.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Originally posted by SlowwHand
Whatever Imran. So now you even correct Clinton. Ok.

Negotiating does not equal getting it passed. This is basic stuff here, Sloww.

Wilson helped negotiate the Treaty of Versailles, but the US Senate never passed it, for one example.

[SlowwHand]

Like I said, whatever. You are always right.

[Imran Siddiqui]

I thank you for acknowledging it. Now take your pwned ass and go home .

[KrazyHorse]

Originally posted by Lonestar


At least the Republicans get their act togather every now and then and give out clear platforms (Contract with America et al) Democrats go "Hurrr, hurr, hurr"

Contract with America was 12 years ago...

[realpolitic]

Originally posted by Comrade Tassadar
No. Bush has become so bad that "Not bush" is sufficent to replace him with.

True, if we replaced Bush's policies with Henry VIII's, it would be a big improvement.

[realpolitic]

In fact, if we removed Bush from the White House, and stuck Henry VIII's skeleton in The Oval Office, we'd be better off.

[Ninot]

Don't blame me, I voted for Kronos!

[Drake Tungsten]

The Dems sure are getting better at playing dirty. To leak a classified National Intelligence Estimate and then use said NIE in a political ad? Even Rove has to admire the brazeness of that...