It's interesting how you give MacTavish credit for recognizing that Schremp needs to be in the minors, but refuse to do so for Sutter. The only difference between the two situations is Sutter's move with Kiprusoff is a proven commodity, while Schremp isn't even close to being one.
It's curious to me that you think the head coach of an NHL team doesn't have a whole lot to do with his players' development over a period of six years.
Do you understand how hockey works?
It's curious to me that you think the head coach of an NHL team doesn't have a whole lot to do with his players' development over a period of six years.
Do you understand how hockey works?
Comment