Throughout history there seems to be two competing, great ideas. One is that by naming your enemy, you gain power over them. The other is that by naming your enemy, they gain power over you.
You can see this in fiction of all types, and very explicitly in speculative fiction (but you can see it in more mainstream lit, like books by Melville for example).
Stories I have read suggest that both ideas have been arround for a long time, and both have found many proponents. By enemy I don't neccesarily mean a person, I could also mean a thing (the whole being to thy own self be true is naming your enemy..).
While lit. seems to overall be in favor of naming your enemy, it seems that in general life many many (the majority?) of people at all ages of the world have considered that in naming their enemies, that that gives their enemies power over them.
So now I ask apolyton, what is your oppinion on this?
Jon Miller
(famous example of this in speculative fiction is LoTR, but it is in all sorts of other speculative fiction, including that which isn't derivative)
You can see this in fiction of all types, and very explicitly in speculative fiction (but you can see it in more mainstream lit, like books by Melville for example).
Stories I have read suggest that both ideas have been arround for a long time, and both have found many proponents. By enemy I don't neccesarily mean a person, I could also mean a thing (the whole being to thy own self be true is naming your enemy..).
While lit. seems to overall be in favor of naming your enemy, it seems that in general life many many (the majority?) of people at all ages of the world have considered that in naming their enemies, that that gives their enemies power over them.
So now I ask apolyton, what is your oppinion on this?
Jon Miller
(famous example of this in speculative fiction is LoTR, but it is in all sorts of other speculative fiction, including that which isn't derivative)
Comment