How is Mexico significantly older than the United States?
Independence as a country: half a century later (at the earliest meaningful definition thereof)
Settlement: half a century earlier
Discovery: maybe a century earlier
Massacre of native population: equally thorough
Discrimination against modern native population: somewhat more significant
I'd say they're just as built on immigrants, just not quite as large a selection![yeah right!](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/hm.gif)
The US, as with Australia and other large immigrant-founded nations, encouraged immigration with simple laws allowing immigration when we were still empty and needed more laborers and citizens. Now that we're not empty, and don't have (as greaf of) a need for laborers, we don't have as easy access. Combine that with the modern age and the fact that civil society is much more regulated than it was a century or two ago, and you'll find that it's not much of a surprise that it's not as easy as buying a plane ticket to immigrate.
That said, we have more anti-immigrant sentiment than is appropriate in my opinion. But I don't think that necessarily is related or the cause of our immigration regulations themselves. Most of the people actually running this country pretty much understand the real situtation re: immigration, and understand that it's necessary to some extent.
Why else is Bush supporting the immigration compromise (and if anything is more on the side of allowing it)? He's generally been against civil liberties in his presidency, and on the side of the "USA! USA!" hawks...
Independence as a country: half a century later (at the earliest meaningful definition thereof)
Settlement: half a century earlier
Discovery: maybe a century earlier
Massacre of native population: equally thorough
Discrimination against modern native population: somewhat more significant
I'd say they're just as built on immigrants, just not quite as large a selection
![yeah right!](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/hm.gif)
The US, as with Australia and other large immigrant-founded nations, encouraged immigration with simple laws allowing immigration when we were still empty and needed more laborers and citizens. Now that we're not empty, and don't have (as greaf of) a need for laborers, we don't have as easy access. Combine that with the modern age and the fact that civil society is much more regulated than it was a century or two ago, and you'll find that it's not much of a surprise that it's not as easy as buying a plane ticket to immigrate.
That said, we have more anti-immigrant sentiment than is appropriate in my opinion. But I don't think that necessarily is related or the cause of our immigration regulations themselves. Most of the people actually running this country pretty much understand the real situtation re: immigration, and understand that it's necessary to some extent.
Why else is Bush supporting the immigration compromise (and if anything is more on the side of allowing it)? He's generally been against civil liberties in his presidency, and on the side of the "USA! USA!" hawks...
Comment