Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Let the good times roll! 177,000 new jobs in US in March

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Let the good times roll! 177,000 new jobs in US in March

    The increase for March was 211,000, with revisions downward in the prior two months figures of 34,000. The net new jobs announced is therefore 177,000. The 3 month average is +197,000 per month.

    We're fairly close to full employment. My area is definitely at full employment (~3% unemployment). Even the city itself is sporting an unemployment rate of 5.3% -- the lowest rate since 1990.

    At this pace, better than modest wage increases are on tap.

    From the LA Times...

    Solid Growth for U.S. Payrolls
    An increase of 211,000 helps push the jobless rate down to 4.7% in March as all sectors except manufacturing post employment gains.
    By Joel Havemann, Times Staff Writer
    April 8, 2006

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. economy turned in a solid performance last month, adding a net 211,000 new jobs and driving the unemployment rate back to its lowest point in the current expansion, the government reported Friday.

    March's unemployment rate fell to 4.7% — down from 4.8% — matching the level of two months earlier. That was the lowest rate since July 2001, when the economy was in recession.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    The job gain exceeded economists' consensus forecast by 21,000. But the Labor Department revised downward its estimates of job growth in the prior two months by 34,000.

    All major economic sectors added jobs in March except manufacturing, which lost 5,000.

    Wages rose modestly. Average weekly earnings by production workers rose by $1.01 to $557.36, 3.7% more than a year earlier. But adjusted for price inflation, wages rose only 0.1% in the last year.

    Friday's job report provided the latest evidence that the economy had rebounded strongly from a slump at the end of last year.

    But policymakers at the Federal Reserve have warned that "possible increases in resource utilization" — Fed-speak for lower unemployment and higher factory usage — could stoke inflation.

    Seeing the latest report as potentially inflationary, economists on Friday generally nudged higher their expectations of where the Fed would take short-term interest rates. At each of its last 15 meetings, the Fed's policymaking committee has raised its benchmark short-term rate by one-quarter of a percentage point in an effort to restrain inflation. The rate now stands at 4.75%.

    Most economists already expect at least one more increase in May, to 5%. Jan Hatzius, chief U.S. economist for Goldman, Sachs & Co., said Friday's job report made it somewhat more likely that the Fed would go to 5.25% in June.

    Such predictions disappointed investors hoping for an end to Fed rate hikes, sending stock prices lower and bond yields higher.

    The Bush administration, however, trumpeted the employment report as a rare and welcome piece of political good news. Within an hour of its release, President Bush said "These millions of new jobs are evidence of an economic resurgence that is strong, broad and benefiting all Americans."

    He credited the American entrepreneurial spirit and the tax cuts of his first term for creating "jobs and growth for the American people," and he urged Congress not to let the tax cuts expire.

    In rebuttal, Rep. George Miller (D-Martinez) accused Bush of being "completely out of touch with reality." For all but the "Rolls-Royce Republicans," he said, wages have stagnated or worse.

    The administration made much of the fact that the March job report sent the economy's total job gain above 5 million since the low point in August 2003. The economy has added jobs at a rate of 167,000 a month since then.

    By contrast, however, the economy generated 240,000 jobs a month during the second half of the 1990s. Job creation during the entire decade of the 1990s proceeded at an average of 180,000 a month — faster than in the current expansion even though the decade began with the 1990-91 recession.

    Nigel Gault, U.S. economist for Global Insight, an economic consulting firm in Waltham, Mass., said the current level of job growth may prove more sustainable than that of the 1990s, which led to the 2001 recession.

    "Business had hired people it turned out not to need, and the recession was the payback for false expectations," Gault said.

    Today's job environment is a healthy one for suppliers of temporary workers. Bernadette Kenny, vice president of human resources for Adecco Staffing North America, said Adecco had placed an unusually high number of temps at other firms. Overall employment is growing, she said, not because companies are taking on more workers — there are about 4.7 million hires every month — but because fewer workers are leaving their jobs each month.

    In some corners of the economy, however, Friday's job report was not so rosy. After losing an additional 5,000 jobs, the manufacturing sector was responsible for only 10.5% of all jobs in March.

    Chi Nguyen, an economist with the National Assn. of Manufacturers, blamed "sky-high" natural gas prices for some of manufacturing's woes. "And strong productivity growth, spurred by low-cost global competition, isn't helping job creation either," Nguyen said.

    Those dislocated by Hurricane Katrina are also still struggling. More than six months after the storm, slightly more than half of those who evacuated their homes have returned, and their unemployment rate was 5.3% in March — only 0.6 of a percentage point more than the national rate, according to the Labor Department.

    But among those who had not returned, the unemployment rate was 34.7%.

    The Federal Reserve reported separately that consumer credit rose at an annual rate of only 1.8% in February. If maintained for a year, that rate would be the lowest of the decade. Consumer credit grew at an annual rate of 3.4% in January.
    I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

  • #2
    New jobs are always good but what is the participation rate? I believe that is the best way to tell if we're actually at full employment vs just counting the people receiving unemployment benifets.
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

    Comment


    • #3
      We aren't "just counting the people receiving unemployment benefits."

      The employment/population ratio for everybody 16+ is 63% -- about the same as in 1996.
      I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

      Comment


      • #4
        That is the number we should be tracking. How does 63% compare to the historical rate?
        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

        Comment


        • #5
          Good.

          Here's the chart. NB: The chart is biased, because it starts with about 58%, rather than 0. Also, the recent figures have problems, in that the population figures haven't been collected since the 2000 census. We're working off of estimates for the figures since 2000.

          The employment/population 16+ ratio topped out very briefly at 64.7% in April, 2000. The bottom of the most recent cycle was 62.0% in September, 2003.
          Attached Files
          Last edited by DanS; April 8, 2006, 12:57.
          I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

          Comment


          • #6
            Remember Dan, that these are obviously McJobs.

            I find it odd that the number of fast food joints remains the same, yet apparently they have been hiring 100,000 more workers every month for the past year. Odd.
            "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

            Comment


            • #7
              Well there won't be many new jobs in industry anymore I'm afraid

              Comment


              • #8
                In Europe, that's certainly a true statement.

                In America, there are tons of venture capital and private equity money looking for a place to deploy. You just need the right skill and motivation to get a piece of the action.

                Comment


                • #9
                  OMT: He's referring to manufacturing when he writes "industry."
                  I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The yield curve certainly is confirming the strength of the labor market as the 10 year treasury jumped 10 basis points on Friday. The financial market is now pricing in for more interest rate hikes beyond May. I'm not optimistic about the stock market.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      So what piece of the action have you taken?
                      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Right. One of the things that separates me from richness right now is that I live in communist country that has 0 potential for capital venturists and other resources.

                        But hey, I can always kill people or move to Turkmenistan.
                        In da butt.
                        "Do not worry if others do not understand you. Instead worry if you do not understand others." - Confucius
                        THE UNDEFEATED SUPERCITIZEN w:4 t:2 l:1 (DON'T ASK!)
                        "God is dead" - Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" - God.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by DanS
                          OMT: He's referring to manufacturing.
                          That may be true, too. I don't actually like this trend because our country needs a manufacturing base just for the national security reason alone.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I know, it is worrying how all the creation of wealth is outsourced to other parts of the world.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              It's like in the good old days before industrialisation. Just this time without any extra precious metals for Europe to buy stuff from Asia.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X