Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NFL Rule Changes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NFL Rule Changes

    The official source for Los Angeles Chargers news, schedules, stats, scores, tickets and more.


    Lots of heated debate in the office about the rule changes. I'm kind of wishy washy about the quaterback protection rule.

    Touchdown celebrations: Players cannot use the football as a prop or drop to the ground during post-touchdown revelry. Players can spike the football, dunk it over the crossbar, spin it on the ground or jump into the stands with it to celebrate with fans. They won't be permitted to use a goal-line pylon to putt the football or do push-ups, two of the celebrations performed by Cincinnati receiver Chad Johnson last season. Players violating the rule will receive a 15-yard unsportsmanlike conduct penalty, to be imposed on the ensuing kickoff and also may be fined.

    Down by contact: Down-by-contact calls can now be reviewed to determine if the ball came out before the ball carrier was down as well as who recovered it. In the past, those plays were not reviewable when officials ruled the whistle had ended the play.

    Protecting QBs: Pass rushers are now prohibited from hitting a passer in or below the knee unless they are blocked into him. The NFL officiating department showed low hits that caused injuries to Cincinnati's Carson Palmer, Pittsburgh's Ben Roethlisberger and Tampa Bay's Brian Griese, although in all cases, those would not have drawn penalties because the rushers were blocked in such a way that they could not avoid the hits.

    Horse-collar tackles: The rule enacted last season was toughened by banning tacklers from taking down ball carriers from the rear by tugging inside their jerseys. Last year's rule required that the tackler's hand got inside the runner's shoulder pads. Only two horse collars were called in the 2005 season, and the officiating department said one was an incorrect call.

    Protecting snappers: In an effort to avoid injuries to long snappers, players are prohibited from lining up directly over center on field goals and extra points.
    Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh

  • #2
    Oh, they are dumb. The horse collar tackle expansion is the most ridiculous. If you can't grab the back of the jersey, how are you going to tackle someone who you've caught from behind?

    And the NFL is going WAAAY too far on the celebration penalties.

    But I like the challenges for down by contact.
    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

    Comment


    • #3
      using the football as a prop...

      "I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
      'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger

      Comment


      • #4
        Yep... the networks sell sports as entertainment... so let's limit those celebrations.... morons...

        I have to agree with Imran (sigh)... the only good change is the down by contact rule.
        Keep on Civin'
        RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

        Comment


        • #5
          So on the rushing the passer rule . . .

          If the rusher tries to tackle as required and misses . . . . he then cannot reach out and grab the ankle of the QB??

          Or if the QB is rolling away and he could maybe just barely get the QB from behind . . . that wouldn't be allowed since the contact would be low??
          You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

          Comment


          • #6
            Why are "celebration penalties" limited to touchdowns? What about the idiot antics that accompany sacks or tackles that result in lost yardage? It should be all or nothing - why touchdown celebrations to a different standard?

            And do QBs really need more protection? I like the way they cited examples of injuries, but none of them resulted from what's now being prohibited.
            "Stuie has the right idea" - Japher
            "I trust Stuie and all involved." - SlowwHand
            "Stuie is right...." - Guynemer

            Comment


            • #7
              Uggg.
              "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
              "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

              Comment


              • #8
                Not sure if I agree about the down by contact rule. The point of the old rule was that if te whistle blew the play ended. Now are players to assume that if the whistle blows they should continue playing just in case the play is reviewed. Maybe I don't understand it fully but it seems to say that the whistle is no longer the official end of the play.

                As for celebrations - I am sick of them. I don't mind spontaneous emotion but I can't stand choreographed self indulgance.

                As for the other three: I don't really like any of them but doubt they will have any noticable effect on the game.

                Regarding the new QB Protection rule, how do the define "hit" Can you use your arms and hands to grab someones ankles?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Since Pittsburg took care of Palmer, the whole Chad Johnson issue will take care of itself really.
                  "Yay Apoc!!!!!!!" - bipolarbear
                  "At least there were some thoughts went into Apocalypse." - Urban Ranger
                  "Apocalype was a great game." - DrSpike
                  "In Apoc, I had one soldier who lasted through the entire game... was pretty cool. I like apoc for that reason, the soldiers are a bit more 'personal'." - General Ludd

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Monkey!!!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
                      Oh, they are dumb. The horse collar tackle expansion is the most ridiculous. If you can't grab the back of the jersey, how are you going to tackle someone who you've caught from behind?
                      .
                      I agree. I made many a tackle by grabbing the jersey

                      While I don't really like the choreographed crap that often occurs, it is about entertainment and I think it's silly to limit the celebration especially since it's a judgment call at what exactly excessive means.


                      Originally posted by Stuie Why are "celebration penalties" limited to touchdowns? What about the idiot antics that accompany sacks or tackles that result in lost yardage? It should be all or nothing - why touchdown celebrations to a different standard?
                      I hate it when people jump up and down after a sack or tackle for loss yardage especially when the team is behind by a large margine but I can also understand that at that moment for that player it was a very big moment. That is especially true if he has gotten his ass beat on play after play. For him it was a big deal. For me watching on tv it's stupid.
                      Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        No. Fun. League.

                        And why show film on QB injuries that wouldn't even be penalized?

                        Have there been lots of injuries to long snappers? Obviously, you don't want guys jumping up and landing on people (isn't that illegal anyway?), but the best way to block a kick is to get pressure up the middle. Should PATs and short FGs now be a gimme?

                        Down by contact - so if there's a fumble, you play until the fumble is recovered, even if the whistle has blown?
                        Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
                        Iain Banks missed deadline due to Civ | The eyes are the groin of the head. - Dwight Schrute.
                        One more turn .... One more turn .... | WWTSD

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I'm okay with most of this stuff. Including limiting celebrations. There's a reason why NFL is number 1. It's still pretty much a team sport. Though the wide recievers are doing their best to make it all about individual performances. I don't want to see the NFL go the way of the NBA.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            wide recievers for the most part cant carry a team by themself. runningbacks and qbs are where its at and even if you have a mediocre WR crew a good qb with a good rb will get you far. seahawks anyone?
                            "I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
                            'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              yes, but they act like they carry the team.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X