Honestly, I fail to see the difference between regionalism, a form of provincialism, and nationalism, also a form of provincialism. It's a matter of degrees.
Regionalism tends to lead towards things like, "Damn ****in' Southerners" and the like. Nationalism tends to lean towards things like, "Damn ****in' Dutch".
Regionalism, by the way, has led to some rather nasty events. The Kwangju Massacre, for instance, had a large regionalist component--not nationalist. It was a massive, oppressive move on what were considered Korean hicks by the Korean elite. Or, the American Civil War. Plenty regionalist sentiment there, rather than nationalist. Everybody was American, they just had different ideas of how America should be led.
Honestly? Regionalism has just as much to do with sports teams as Nationalism does.
It's just easier to see Nationalism because few people fly city flags on their cars.
Regionalism tends to lead towards things like, "Damn ****in' Southerners" and the like. Nationalism tends to lean towards things like, "Damn ****in' Dutch".
Regionalism, by the way, has led to some rather nasty events. The Kwangju Massacre, for instance, had a large regionalist component--not nationalist. It was a massive, oppressive move on what were considered Korean hicks by the Korean elite. Or, the American Civil War. Plenty regionalist sentiment there, rather than nationalist. Everybody was American, they just had different ideas of how America should be led.
Honestly? Regionalism has just as much to do with sports teams as Nationalism does.
It's just easier to see Nationalism because few people fly city flags on their cars.
Comment