Torino torched for gas guzzling flame
Organizers say flame will have little environmental impact
TORINO, Italy (Reuters) -- The Torino Winter Olympics will mar mountains and waste enough gas with its symbolic flame to supply a small town, but damage will be limited by smart energy planning, a leading environmental group said on Wednesday.
WWF, formerly the World Worldlife Fund but now known by its initials, gave the Games a mixed report card in a 38-page document.
It slammed a bobsled track and two ski jumps that slice down two mountainsides, but praised organizers for using clean fuel and recycling waste.
"It could have been better, but it could have been a lot worse," said Sergio Savoia, director of the WWF's Alpine program.
Roberto Saini, environmental director at the TOROC organizing committee, said: "We were rather pleasantly surprised. They have delivered a largely positive assessment."
The WWF called the 5-meter (16-foot) high Olympic flame, which will be lit at the opening ceremony on Friday evening and burn until the end of the Games on February 26, "a kind of mockery, a monument to waste".
The flame, which will flicker atop a 57-meter (187-foot) high torch, will burn some 3 million cubic meters (105 million cubic feet) of gas during the Games -- enough to supply a town of 3,500 people for an entire year, it said.
But Saini said WWF had overestimated the amount of gas, and the methane would have a negligible impact on the environment.
He acknowledged that by their nature the 1,435-meter long bobsled and twin ski jumps would have an impact, but that they were designed to hug the mountain and any trees cut down were offset by plantings elsewhere.
Still the WWF, like other environmental groups, said it would have been better to use existing bobsled and jumping facilities in neighboring France rather than bequeath yet more tracks to the relatively restricted circle of such athletes.
WWF also criticized the use of artificial snow, saying it weighs as much as five times more than real snow, damaging the ground and requiring millions of cubic meters of water.
But the group also listed seven positive results, including the construction of buildings in Torino that will be used after the Games, clean-fuel public transport and recycling of materials in the Olympic villages.
The organizers say the Torino Games will be the most environmentally friendly Olympics ever and, by offsetting all carbon emissions produced during the 17 days, will have no net impact on climate change.
"Even Winter Olympics have to have some environmental impact," Saini said. "But in this case it is not overly dramatic."
WWF, whose logo is a panda, has developed into a global network dedicated to stopping the degradation of the earth's natural environment.
Organizers say flame will have little environmental impact
TORINO, Italy (Reuters) -- The Torino Winter Olympics will mar mountains and waste enough gas with its symbolic flame to supply a small town, but damage will be limited by smart energy planning, a leading environmental group said on Wednesday.
WWF, formerly the World Worldlife Fund but now known by its initials, gave the Games a mixed report card in a 38-page document.
It slammed a bobsled track and two ski jumps that slice down two mountainsides, but praised organizers for using clean fuel and recycling waste.
"It could have been better, but it could have been a lot worse," said Sergio Savoia, director of the WWF's Alpine program.
Roberto Saini, environmental director at the TOROC organizing committee, said: "We were rather pleasantly surprised. They have delivered a largely positive assessment."
The WWF called the 5-meter (16-foot) high Olympic flame, which will be lit at the opening ceremony on Friday evening and burn until the end of the Games on February 26, "a kind of mockery, a monument to waste".
The flame, which will flicker atop a 57-meter (187-foot) high torch, will burn some 3 million cubic meters (105 million cubic feet) of gas during the Games -- enough to supply a town of 3,500 people for an entire year, it said.
But Saini said WWF had overestimated the amount of gas, and the methane would have a negligible impact on the environment.
He acknowledged that by their nature the 1,435-meter long bobsled and twin ski jumps would have an impact, but that they were designed to hug the mountain and any trees cut down were offset by plantings elsewhere.
Still the WWF, like other environmental groups, said it would have been better to use existing bobsled and jumping facilities in neighboring France rather than bequeath yet more tracks to the relatively restricted circle of such athletes.
WWF also criticized the use of artificial snow, saying it weighs as much as five times more than real snow, damaging the ground and requiring millions of cubic meters of water.
But the group also listed seven positive results, including the construction of buildings in Torino that will be used after the Games, clean-fuel public transport and recycling of materials in the Olympic villages.
The organizers say the Torino Games will be the most environmentally friendly Olympics ever and, by offsetting all carbon emissions produced during the 17 days, will have no net impact on climate change.
"Even Winter Olympics have to have some environmental impact," Saini said. "But in this case it is not overly dramatic."
WWF, whose logo is a panda, has developed into a global network dedicated to stopping the degradation of the earth's natural environment.
I want my World Wrestling Federation back.
Comment