This was SomethingAwful's Awful Link of the Day (my roommate got me addicted to SA, damn him). I'll begin by stating the obvious: these people appear to be completely out of their freaking minds. This isn't the stupidest thing I've ever heard that was taken seriously by adults (it's got some competition in the form of Scientology, various conspiracy theories, et cetera), but it's pretty wacky. Now, that's just my opinion, and judging by my own bitter experiences with 'Poly, there will be at least one person out there who thinks these folks have the right idea, and he/she (probably he) will argue vehemently in its favor. There is no system of beliefs too lame to have proponents on the OT, that's just a law of nature. The "sour grapes" factor alone should be appealing to many of you out there; their form of transhumanism views masturbation as superior to sex.
With that said, does anybody here know enough about technology to determine whether there's even the slightest chance of any of this crap coming to pass? I don't mean the technopocalypse or whatever (this whole site may have been cribbed from an early episode of "Sealab: 2021"), but the general transhumanist pipe dreams. Uploading one's brain to a computer, for example. That seems, intuitively, impossible, just because I know the brain apparently works by emergence. Our thoughts are the product of millions upon millions of interactions between simple neurons. Our thinking is a function of our brains' architecture, or so I understand it.
An artificial brain would therefore have to mimic all those connections, which would then presumptively have to be selectively strengthened to simulate the workings of an individual brain, or something like that. That's a staggering amount of work, and in order for the replication to work all the connections would have to be made perfectly, plus you'd want them double-checked. You have to wonder who'd be doing all that...and that's just for starters. Getting a non-biological apparatus with several million small parts that didn't break down or overheat (the ostensible advantage over flesh-brains being durability)?
Also on the list of possibilities: using advanced biological techniques of one kind or another to enhance our intelligence. This would seem to assume that human science can, within a hundred years, outdo millions of years of natural progress. It's also less favorable to their ideology, as they regard flesh as an inferior medium prone to wearing out.
Er, am I wrong?
EDIT: Okay, I looked at their page on "uploading" (briefly). They seem to advocate not actual uploading into a computer but a "fossilization" of the brain by replacing neurons with functionally-identical electronic equivalents. How these would be less prone to breakdown than cells, given their number, is unclear.
Comment