Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bush to give up the ghost.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    What does Fez not have his own definition of?
    Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

    It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
    The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok

    Comment


    • #17
      I'd say "sanity" but I fear the paradox might tear the fabric of space-time, destroying the universe.

      That, or it might at least make God cry.
      The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.

      The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.

      Comment


      • #18
        Speaking of reality-bending, where's Ned?
        The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.

        The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.

        Comment


        • #19
          I wonder if Bush & friends will find a way to cover their retreat by somehow blaming it on gays.

          Maybe like "the troops are needed back home to defend our nation's traditional values against the threat of homosexual marriage and judicial activism."

          Hey at this point, I don't think I can be surprised anymore by this gang.
          Official Homepage of the HiRes Graphics Patch for Civ2

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by mindseye
            I wonder if Bush & friends will find a way to cover their retreat by somehow blaming it on gays.
            Actually I think this time he's just going to claim progress in the training of the Iraqi military. Sorry, you're just not important enough this time. Though I do think any talk of a reduction in troop lvls should have been put off until after the Dec. elections.
            I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
            For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by mindseye
              I wonder if Bush & friends will find a way to cover their retreat by somehow blaming it on gays.

              Maybe like "the troops are needed back home to defend our nation's traditional values against the threat of homosexual marriage and judicial activism."

              Hey at this point, I don't think I can be surprised anymore by this gang.
              mindseye is MrFun's DL? Wow, that's surprising...
              KH FOR OWNER!
              ASHER FOR CEO!!
              GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

              Comment


              • #22
                He failed to mention Lincoln though. Thus he fails the MrFun's DL test.
                I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                Comment


                • #23
                  Gianni the American Spanish Argentinian ladyboy arguing with an Iraq vet about military terms You should stick to fashion advice and lose the general's hat.
                  If you look around and think everyone else is an *******, you're the *******.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Boris Godunov
                    Doesn't "giving up the ghost" mean dying?
                    No, it means you're giving up on a fairy tail. No longer telling people about the ghost that lives in the attic and admiting it was just a made up story.
                    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by The Mad Monk


                      I suspect it means the unit in question is able to fight effectively against units of professionally trained troops in a full-blown war with another nation.

                      Is there another definition?
                      The Pentigon's assessment was that they weren't even ready for independent operations against the insurgency much less other nations. They did say several battalions were up to taking part in operations if the US or UK lead the operation and held their hands but, in the Pentigon's opinion, only one battalion was ready to act independently.
                      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Tattila the Hun
                        What exactly would happen, if the army were to reach "breaking point"? Revolt, desertion, coup d'etat?
                        No body knows. I suppose the US & UK would have to step in again though politically that would be extremely difficult and very unpopular. BTW even the Pentigo has said there is a 50-50 chance of civil war once the foreigners leave or even majorly scale back their presence.
                        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by DinoDoc
                          Actually I think this time he's just going to claim progress in the training of the Iraqi military. Sorry, you're just not important enough this time. Though I do think any talk of a reduction in troop lvls should have been put off until after the Dec. elections.
                          Supposedly, that is the plan. What ever the results or facts on the ground to begin a drawdown after the election and to make sure it is mostly complete before the 2006 election in the US. Republican politicians at all levels have been urging the White House to be mostly out by the next election and are practically crapping their pants at the thought of losing due to the war's unpopularity.
                          Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I highly doubt that is the case.
                            I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                            For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Hypothetically speaking, which is worse for the republicans

                              For the troops to stay in Iraq, no partial withdrawal whatsoever, by the 2006 elections

                              or partial to full troop pullout, with even larger problems arising, such as increased bombings or civil war.
                              Resident Filipina Lady Boy Expert.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                They know they're facing a major up hill battle in the next election if the troops are still there where as they're likely hoping nothing blows up there until after the election.
                                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X