Originally posted by Verto
Eh, first off, the article is talking about the number of items that scanned WRONG - which means under-charging a customer, as well as over-charging. Granted, it states that overall the overcharges outnumbered the undercharged, but not by how much.
And I don't know what to say about that "1.33$" comment you cite from the TV news. Is that items that ring up wrong and that the customer pays, or items that ring up wrong and are then corrected when the customer notices it?
And of course, with the hundreds of trillions of dollars that Wal-Mart is making off of this - no doubt to fuel their WMD program - you don't take into account money they lose when refunding customers at a price higher than the item's value.
Eh, first off, the article is talking about the number of items that scanned WRONG - which means under-charging a customer, as well as over-charging. Granted, it states that overall the overcharges outnumbered the undercharged, but not by how much.
And I don't know what to say about that "1.33$" comment you cite from the TV news. Is that items that ring up wrong and that the customer pays, or items that ring up wrong and are then corrected when the customer notices it?
And of course, with the hundreds of trillions of dollars that Wal-Mart is making off of this - no doubt to fuel their WMD program - you don't take into account money they lose when refunding customers at a price higher than the item's value.
so that includes undercharges as well
this was NBC 5 news in Chicago
they usually have video clips... I'll keep checking their website and post a link if they put one up
Comment