Libby Indicted

[Alexander's Horse]

Originally posted by Timexwatch
a whole gaggle of LaRouchies

Can someone explain this phenomenon. They recently popped up in Australia peddling some weird newspaper which put Lyndon LaRouche at the centre of world affairs.

[molly bloom]

Originally posted by Alexander's Horse


Can someone explain this phenomenon. They recently popped up in Australia peddling some weird newspaper which put Lyndon LaRouche at the centre of world affairs.

They're the slightly better dressed equivalent of the rambling remnants of Care in the Community who you can encounter on street corners and park benches the world over.


I first noticed them in Vancouver in 1989, then read up about them. Apparently a tenet of their belief is that Lizzie Windsor is a world class drug dealin bee-yatch, sho'nuff, amongst other unlikely scenarios.

His conspiracy theories have implicated Queen Elizabeth, "British bankers," the Pope, narcotics producers, Jesuits, Yale University's Skull & Crossbones Society, environmentalists, and many others.

http://selectsmart.com/president/LaRouche.html

So, indistinguishable from many 'Poly posters, in other words.


This is hilarious, by the way:

British Magazine Publishes
Death Threat vs. LaRouche
by Mark Burdman

High-level circles in the British oligarchy have planted an article in a widely read British women's magazine, the which is an unmistakeable death threat against Lyndon LaRouche, a candidate for the Democratic Party nomination for the American Presidency and the founder of EIR. Best estimates are that the article, which appeared in the tabloid women's magazine Take a Break, was planted by Britain's MI6 secret service and/or senior advisers to Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace.

In its Aug. 5 edition, Take a Break published an article under the banner headline, "Shut This Man's Mouth," with a large photo of LaRouche appearing next to these words. Written by one Katie Fraser, the piece characterized LaRouche as "dangerous," and claimed that Buckingham Palace has become "increasingly alarmed" at the fact that exposés by LaRouche-associated publications about the British monarchy, such as the alleged royal family's involvement in the death of Princess Diana, "are being spread around the globe," and are being read in places like China, the Middle East, South America, and Africa, thanks to their circulation, including over the Internet.

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/1999/2632_brit_death_threat.html

'Take a Break' is not the equivalent of MI5's or MI6's in house magazine, or 'Soldier Of Fortune', but is in fact the kind of magazine aimed at women at the check out till in a supermarket.

http://www.newsstand.co.uk/254-Women's-Weeklies/1981-TAKE-A-BREAK.aspx

Just where you'd expect to find recruits to do the House of Windsor's wetwork missions.

[Ted Striker]

Perhaps the LaRouche squad should team up with the Scientologists?

[DanS]

LaRouchites would be a plague, if there were very many of them.

Sometimes they load up a flat bed of a semi truck with 30 or 40 screaming demonstrators and go around DC during lunchtime making noise and throwing their propaganda at pedestrians.

[Timexwatch]

I haven't seen that one. They can't be as noisy as the truck with the megaphones and the aborted fetus pictures on the side.

[Zkribbler]

Originally posted by Ted Striker
Libby is indeed the fall guy, and it's so obvious to everyone involved.

Fall guy, indeed. Notice we wasn't indicted for anything before he [allegedly] started lying? So, why did he start lying? He's covering up for someone!!

[DinoDoc]

It's amusing that there was no crime until the investigation started. I also love that the paranoid conspiracy theories are starting to crop up among the Dems here.

[Ted Striker]

"Paranoid conspiracy theories"

Okay

The idea of a bigger coverup was put forth on every news channel I have watched including the local FOX affiliate.

Get your head out of the sand dude.

And finally, not everybody that disagrees with the President is a "Dem" DONT GET IT TWISTED.

I know that labelling everyone who disagrees with the President must be part of the "other side" is a Reactionary axiom but you know that's not always the case, maybe you know actual checks and balances is a good thing. Who would've thought??

K THANKS

[Odin]

Ted Striker:

[Drake Tungsten]

This indictment is even lamer than Clinton's.

[Ted Striker]

Exposing a CIA agent is the equivalent of getting your d1ck sucked to you???

[Drake Tungsten]

Who's being accused of exposing a CIA agent? Both indictments were for perjury...

[Drake Tungsten]

Actually, I looked it up and Clinton cut a deal with the independent counsel so that he wasn't indicted. As such, I'll change my statement to "this indictment is a bit less lame than what happened to Clinton".

[Ted Striker]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Who's being accused of exposing a CIA agent? Both indictments were for perjury...

The whole investigation is about outting a CIA agent the same as the Clinton thing was about him getting his d1ck sucked.

[Drake Tungsten]

The Clinton investigation was about Whitewater. They got him on lying about a blowjob because there wasn't enough proof to get him on the actual crime the investigation was about. The same thing is happening here. We were promised the outting of a CIA agent and all we get is perjury. Lame...