Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Poll: Bush would lose an election if held this year

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 5
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 template Next
  • #61
    Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
    I'm not sure what the topic is anymore; I think the threadjack onto Galloway has taken hold and Mr. Fun's posts dealt with that.

    The original topic was stupid anyway. Whoever started this lame thread should be shot...
    See ya in 24 hours...
    Anybody else want to play stupid games?
    Keep on Civin'
    RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

    Comment

    • #62
      Depends on your definition of stupid now doesn't it?
      "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

      “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

      Comment

      • #63
        Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe
        Depends on your definition of stupid now doesn't it?
        If you have a problem... take it up via PM... If you want to play stupid games as well... you can join Drake.

        Your choice!
        Keep on Civin'
        RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

        Comment

        • #64
          I guess I better walk on eggshells in this thread now.
          A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

          Comment

          • #65
            Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
            No, it doesn't. If I had a Rumsfeld avatar, OTOH, you might have a point.

            And I don't ignore the fact that Rumsfeld supported Saddam at one point. I also don't ignore the fact that Rumsfeld changed his mind and was one of the main proponents of ending Saddam's regime. I wouldn't find Galloway so disgusting if he had done the same.
            Yes but why did he change his mind at some point?

            He didn't change his mind when hundreds of thousands of people were being killed in the Iran-Irak war. He also didn't change his mind in '88 when he found out about the Halabja massacre. It's plain ridiculous Rumsfeld (and his fellow lackeys) refer to the fact that Saddam killed Iraqi citizens when he himself and others condoned it way back. Of course I'm not saying he really approved it (no sane person would do that), but he and the others didn't object to it much. The US continued to support Iraq.

            That's the disgusting thing about the whole situation. They change their opinion on dictators and "evil-doers" like Bush is used to say, depending on their personal interests. They make it seem that they are concerned with justice, democracy and that whole **** while in fact they probably couldn't care less, as long as their own interests are secured and nobody opposes to America's reign too much and that the Middle-East region is stabilized, something they unfortunately can't get done right
            "An archaeologist is the best husband a women can have; the older she gets, the more interested he is in her." - Agatha Christie
            "Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis." - Seneca

            Comment

            Previous 1 2 3 4 5 template Next
            Working...
            X