Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

China Crisis: threat to the global environment

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • China Crisis: threat to the global environment

    Spectacular growth now biggest threat to environment
    By Michael McCarthy, Environment Editor
    Published: 19 October 2005



    Western politicians queue up to sing its praises. Economists regard it with awe and delight. Other countries are desperate to imitate it. Yet there is another side to China's exploding, double-digit-growth miracle economy - it is turning into one of the greatest environmental threats the earth has ever faced.

    An ominous sign of the danger is given in a groundbreaking report from Greenpeace, published today, which maintains that China is now by far the world's biggest driver of rainforest destruction. The report documents the vast deforestation driven by the soaring demands of China's enormous timber trade - the world's largest - as the country's headlong economic development sucks in ever-more amounts of the earth's natural resources.

    Citing figures from the International Tropical Timber Organisation, the Greenpeace study says that nearly five out of every 10 tropical hardwood logs shipped from the world's threatened rainforests are now heading for China - more than to any other destination.

    Yet deforestation is only one of the threats to the planet posed by an economy of 1.3 billion people that has now overtaken the United States as the world's leading consumer of four out of the five basic food, energy and industrial commodities - grain, meat, oil, coal and steel. China now lags behind the US only in consumption of oil - and it is rapidly catching up.

    Because of their increasing reliance on coal-fired power stations to provide their energy, the Chinese are firmly on course to overtake the Americans as the world's biggest emitters of greenhouse gases, and thus become the biggest contributors to global warming and the destabilisation of the climate. If they remain uncontrolled, the growth of China's carbon dioxide emissions over the next 20 years will dwarf any cuts in CO2 that the rest of the world can make.

    Even that, however, is not the ultimate threat from an economy which is growing at a rate the world has never seen before. According to Lester Brown of the Earth Policy Institute in Washington DC, the leading American environmental analyst, China's scarcely imaginable growth in the coming years means that the world's population will simply run up against the limits of the planet's natural resources sooner than anyone imagines.

    If growth continues at 8 per cent a year, Mr Brown said, by 2031 China's population, likely to be 1.45 billion on current UN predictions, will have an income per person equivalent to that of the US today. He said: "China's grain consumption will then be two-thirds of the current grain consumption for the entire world. If it consumes oil at the same rate as the US today, the Chinese will be consuming 99 million barrels a day - and the whole world is currently producing 84 million barrels a day, and will probably not produce much more.

    "If it consumes paper at the same rate we do, it will consume twice as much paper as the world is now producing. There go the world's forests. If the Chinese then have three cars for every four people - as the US does today - they would have a fleet of 1.1 billion cars, compared to the current world fleet of 800 million. They would have to pave over an area equivalent to the area they have planted with rice today, just to drive and park them."

    Mr Brown, who has been tracking and documenting the world's major environmental trends for 30 years, went on: "The point of these conclusions is simply to demonstrate that the western economic model is not going to work for China. All they're doing is what we've already done, so you can't criticise them for that. But what you can say is, it's not going to work. And if it doesn't work for China, by 2031 it won't work for India, which by then will have an even larger population, nor for the other three billion people in the developing countries.

    "And in some way it will not work for the industrialised countries either, because in the incredibly integrated global economy, we all depend on the same oil and the same grain.

    "The bottom line of this analysis is that we're going to have to develop a new economic model. Instead of a fossil-fuel based, automobile-centred, throw-away economy we will have to have a renewable-energy based, diversified transport system, and comprehensive reuse and recycle economies. "If we want civilisation to survive, we will have to have that. Otherwise civilisation will collapse."

    The Greenpeace report is one of the first major indictments of the catastrophic environmental effects the great Chinese industrial behemoth is starting to have on the rest of the world.

    The ecological damage that China's breakneck industrialisation is having on the country itself has been widely recognised. In an interview earlier this year, China's deputy environment minister, Pan Yue, said five of the 10 most polluted cities worldwide are in China; acid rain is falling on one-third of the country; half of the water in its seven largest rivers is "completely useless"; a quarter of China's citizens lack access to clean drinking water; one-third of the urban population is breathing polluted air; and less than a fifth of the rubbish in cities is treated and processed in an environmentally sustainable way. But China's malign environmental "footprint" on other countries has been less widely reported.

    John Sauven, forest campaigner for Greenpeace UK, said: "Western politicians, who think only in terms of gross domestic product, have seen China as some sort of economic wonderland. Tony Blair went to China with British businessmen in September and said how he wanted a slice of the cake. But the growth figures mask an environmental catastrophe. The Chinese are ripping the heart out of the world's irreplaceable rainforests to make cheap products like plywood for Western consumer markets."

    The Greenpeace report details how, with incredible speed, China has become the world's largest plywood producer and exporter. Its export market has grown from less than one million cubic metres per annum in 1998 to nearly 11 million cubic metres in 2004.

    China banned logging in large areas of its own natural forest in 1998 after catastrophic floods, themselves a direct result of deforestation, killed thousands of people. "This ban, coupled with massive growth in Chinese timber processing capacity and a liberalisation of trade barriers, led China to look overseas in its hunger for timber," says the Greenpeace report.

    In one area of China investigated by the group, there were no fewer than 9,000 plywood mills taking in vast numbers of ancient hardwood trees from rainforests in countries such as Papua New Guinea, which are used merely to make plywood panels. Greenpeace contends that many of these trees, if not the majority, have been illegally logged.

    The report, entitled Partners in Crime, does not blame only China - it accuses timber barons in rainforest countries of corruption in illegally supplying the wood, and builders' merchants and DIY outlets in Britain of culpable negligence in supplying plywood without establishing its origin. Chinese hardwood plywood imports to the UK have gone from 1 per cent of the total in 2001 to 30 per cent this year.

    Greenpeace wants the EU, and failing that, Britain alone, to outlaw the import of timber which has not clearly been legally logged. At the moment there are no restrictions on illegally logged timber coming into Britain.

    THE NUMBERS

    Consumption

    China - growing at nearly 10% a year - already consumes more grain, meat, coal and steel than the United States

    Wealth

    China's population will grow from 1.3 billion to 1.45 billion in 26 years - when per capita income will be equal to that of the US today

    Oil

    On current trends, China will by 2031 be consuming 99 million barrels of oil per day. Total world production today is only 84 million bpd

    Forestry

    China is already the biggest driver of rainforest destruction, says Greenpeace. Half of all rainforest logs head for China

    Global warming

    By 2025, China will overtake the US as the top emitter of the greenhouse gases causing global warming

    Cars

    By 2031, China would have 1.1 billion cars if it matches current US trends - bigger than the current world fleet of 800 million
    So when are we finally going to deal with the Chinese menace, instead of rushing to sing its praises?
    Is it me, or is MOBIUS a horrible person?

  • #2
    And your solution is?
    Golfing since 67

    Comment


    • #3
      Probably to have China abide by the same restrictions as the rest of the world. I mean, if they can afford to send men into space, I think they can play on a level field. Maybe we should all whine about how they won't support Kyoto.
      “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
      "Capitalism ho!"

      Comment


      • #4
        China will care even less about Kyoto whining than America does.
        KH FOR OWNER!
        ASHER FOR CEO!!
        GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

        Comment


        • #5
          Interesting projection, but it ignores improvements that will be made in fuel efficiency and other areas.

          Also China won't be growing at 8% compounded for another 30 years. it will tapper off before that. Just look at Japan and RoK.
          (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
          (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
          (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

          Comment


          • #6
            You would have thought that China would be trying to develop its own sustainable forestry industry. Loads of employment, flood and soil protection, environmental kudos and a permanent supply of wood.

            Comment


            • #7
              I , in India , am completely unconcerned . The communist model has to collapse sooner or later .

              Comment


              • #8
                The communist model has to collapse sooner or later .

                True. And a new democratic model would eventually focus on salaries and democratic reforms rather than economic growth. China boom will eventually stop in 15 years
                I will never understand why some people on Apolyton find you so clever. You're predictable, mundane, and a google-whore and the most observant of us all know this. Your battles of "wits" rely on obscurity and whenever you fail to find something sufficiently obscure, like this, you just act like a 5 year old. Congratulations, molly.

                Asher on molly bloom

                Comment


                • #9
                  It seems that China has found an unusual bedfellow :

                  BBC, News, BBC News, news online, world, uk, international, foreign, british, online, service



                  China accused over Burma forests
                  By Tony Cheng
                  BBC correspondent in Bangkok

                  Illegal logging by Chinese timber companies is devastating large stretches of Burma's forests, an environmental watchdog has claimed.

                  A report by Global Witness said the illegal lumber exports to China were destroying some of the most bio-diverse and temperate forest in the world.

                  The report alleges that the illicit trade is going on with the knowledge of the Burmese and Chinese authorities.

                  China's rapid growth is devastating Burma's environment, it said.

                  Fifteen tonnes of illegally logged timber is passing over the Burmese border into China every seven minutes, 24 hours a day, every day of the year, the report said.

                  Ninety-five percent of it is illegally exported, Global Witness said.

                  China signed a commitment to address concerns over illegal logging in 2001, but is has since more than doubled its consumption of illegal Burmese timber, Global Witness said.

                  Both the Chinese and Burmese governments have declined to comment on the allegations.

                  Smuggled goods of all sorts pass relatively freely across the Burmese border into China because of widespread corruption amongst the military officials that control the area.

                  A year ago, Burma's former Prime Minister Khin Nyunt was removed from his post following allegations that he had controlled and profited from many of the smuggling routes.
                  With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                  Steven Weinberg

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Sandman
                    You would have thought that China would be trying to develop its own sustainable forestry industry. Loads of employment, flood and soil protection, environmental kudos and a permanent supply of wood.
                    That's an excellent idea. I guess that would come a bit later, after they get a grip with the peasant problem.

                    A lot of forest land that had been cleared for agriculture was ordered to be replanted with trees.

                    One of my cousins had bought the rights to chop down trees of a hill, then the government decreed that trees can't be cut in that area to protect against flood. Oops.
                    (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
                    (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
                    (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by aneeshm
                      I , in India , am completely unconcerned . The communist model has to collapse sooner or later .
                      What does that have to do with PRC's economic growth? Are you saying that it's the communist model that's driving such a spectacular growth?

                      That's not what you have been saying before.
                      (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
                      (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
                      (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        who's funding all the recent investments in china's economy? is it all home grown capital, or are other countries doing thier bit to help fund the potential enviromental disaster?
                        'The very basis of the liberal idea – the belief of individual freedom is what causes the chaos' - William Kristol, son of the founder of neo-conservitivism, talking about neo-con ideology and its agenda for you.info here. prove me wrong.

                        Bush's Republican=Neo-con for all intent and purpose. be afraid.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Urban Ranger
                          Interesting projection, but it ignores improvements that will be made in fuel efficiency and other areas.
                          But what improvements in fuel efficiency? Most Chinese cities are above capacity while still expanding. What little is being done to improve efficiency will not keep up with the demand for fuel.

                          Also China won't be growing at 8% compounded for another 30 years. it will tapper off before that. Just look at Japan and RoK.
                          I don't know about RoK, but Japan made a conscious effort to reduce its pollution, which had little to do with its economy. It's wrong to assume that just because China's economy will eventually slow down that its pollution levels will improve as a consequence. In fact, if China's economy does slow down, the government may be even more lax in regulating what little pollution laws it has to continue to give its industries an advantage.
                          “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                          "Capitalism ho!"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by child of Thor
                            who's funding all the recent investments in china's economy? is it all home grown capital, or are other countries doing thier bit to help fund the potential enviromental disaster?
                            Other countries is a stretch, but there are a lot of foreign businesses that either do or want to profit from China's lax environment regulation, just as they want to profit from China's cheap labor.
                            “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                            "Capitalism ho!"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by BlackCat
                              It seems that China has found an unusual bedfellow :

                              BBC, News, BBC News, news online, world, uk, international, foreign, british, online, service

                              That's the problem with many of China's environment initiatives. They make big promises, but deliver nothing. And in this case just become work. That's why there are repeating cycles of riots throughout China now. The peasants and workers complain about unfair conditions, the government makes a big promise to improve it, nothing changes (or it gets worse), and the people riot again... I tried to explain this to Tingkai before that just because they say they are going to improve such an such, it is hardly evidence that they will. Even spending money on such programs doesn't mean that they will come to fruition as the money is often wasted through corruption or never actually spent to begin with.
                              “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                              "Capitalism ho!"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X