Tweet
Monster cables are over-hyped, over-priced crap.
-
You may be right, I never read a review of their products.Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – Lessing -
It seems that paying 50$ or 60$ for better cables is a good investment: it makes quite a difference. Now, I wouldn't pay that much for an iPod, but for my stereo, I wouldn't mind.Seriously, if you want to go go with the Monster cable, more power to you.
But why pay $50+ for something when a $15 cord could do the same job, just as well?Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – LessingComment
-
It seems that paying 50$ or 60$ for better cables is a good investment: it makes quite a difference. Now, I wouldn't pay that much for an iPod, but for my stereo, I wouldn't mind.
Perhaps--and you already did spend extra money for an iPod, when a Zen could have done the job.B♭3Comment
-
I bought the iPod Mini because it was cheaper than the Zen Micro, 80$ cheaper. With that extra money, I bought a decent pair of headphones.Perhaps--and you already did spend extra money for an iPod, when a Zen could have done the job.Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – LessingComment
-
Acoustic Research > Monster Cable"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "Comment
-
hmm is there a noticeable improvement of quality by setting the Kbps rate higher than the average 180, or are you just a sound quality geek?
I will never understand why some people on Apolyton find you so clever. You're predictable, mundane, and a google-whore and the most observant of us all know this. Your battles of "wits" rely on obscurity and whenever you fail to find something sufficiently obscure, like this, you just act like a 5 year old. Congratulations, molly.
Asher on molly bloomComment
-
You mean 128 Kbps? I started a thread on this a while back. I'm still a bit sceptical about it all, but I'm keeping my MP3's at 224 Kbps, just in case...hmm is there a noticeable improvement of quality by setting the Kbps rate higher than the average 180, or are you just a sound quality geek?
Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – LessingComment
Comment