Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NASA to return to the Moon

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Are we going to do it for real this time?
    And for the first time..
    -- What history has taught us is that people do not learn from history.
    -- Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.

    Comment


    • #17
      Spend the money on a Space Elevator, it is becoming technically feasable. It is just outside our capability and we now could theoretically do it. Cutting the cost of Orbital Improvement by half.
      The worst form of insubordination is being right - Keith D., marine veteran. A dictator will starve to the last civilian - self-quoted
      And on the eigth day, God realized it was Monday, and created caffeine. And behold, it was very good. - self-quoted
      Klaatu: I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it.
      Mr. Harley: I'm afraid my people haven't. I'm very sorry… I wish it were otherwise.

      Comment


      • #18
        Doesn't anybody realise Bush is trying to claim the moon as US territory ?
        I wonder what mr China will say when he finds out.
        veni vidi PWNED!

        Comment


        • #19
          I'll be dancing in the streets when US/China/Russia withdraws from the Outer Space Treaty and claims territory on the Moon.
          "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master" - Commissioner Pravin Lal.

          Comment


          • #20
            104 Billion? You could get to MARS for under half that (according to one proposal called Mars Direct).

            Comment


            • #21
              Still cheaper than going to Iran or North Korea though.
              Visit First Cultural Industries
              There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild
              Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General Ludd

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Solomwi
                Are we going to do it for real this time?
                No, it will be just like the first time -- an illusion consisting of smoke and mirrors.
                A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Odin
                  104 Billion? You could get to MARS for under half that (according to one proposal called Mars Direct).
                  'Mars Direct'? Even the name sounds like a dodgy travel company!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Vanguard
                    The reason we stopped going to the moon was the fact that there is no reason to go there.

                    There´s a good reason (for scientists).
                    You could build a telescope there,
                    larger than the space telescopes currently used,
                    but as well as Hubbles, not influenced by any kind of atmosphere
                    Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
                    Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Long term we need to launch from either there or orbit. The cost in money/weight/fuel to get off the Earth is astronomical (pun indended)

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Actually, the cost for fuel and other incidentals to get off Earth (e.g., helium) isn't much. About $10 - $20 per pound for a kerosene/liquid oxygen rocket. The cost for fuel for the ground to Mars would probably be about $40 per pound of payload. All in all, something of a rounding error among the other costs involved.
                        I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          You've still got to (pay to) build a rocket big enough to carry all the fuel/payload/itself into orbit.

                          Even if the cost of the fuel isn't much per se, it creates a lot of cost by its enforced use.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by DanS
                            Actually, the cost for fuel and other incidentals to get off Earth (e.g., helium) isn't much. About $10 - $20 per pound for a kerosene/liquid oxygen rocket. The cost for fuel for the ground to Mars would probably be about $40 per pound of payload. All in all, something of a rounding error among the other costs involved.
                            But the cost in Fuel is immense,
                            which is why long range manned missions (to mars for example) should better started from Orbit or Luna than from ground, after all the tonnage of the fuel the Spaceship needs to escape earths gravity well could better be used for further mission payload
                            Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
                            Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              A great troll from I think usenet "apollo 18 to launch in 2018".

                              we still have those things just taking up space in Huntsville.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                But the cost in Fuel is immense,
                                which is why long range manned missions (to mars for example) should better started from Orbit or Luna than from ground, after all the tonnage of the fuel the Spaceship needs to escape earths gravity well could better be used for further mission payload
                                Actually, it's a misconception that going to Mars from the moon would save fuel. Going from the Earth to the moon requires more energy than going from the Earth to Mars.

                                In any event, the cost in fuel isn't immense.
                                I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X