Originally posted by VetLegion
This decision was not about something where both options are equally attractive. This was choosing to walk on the sidewalk versus walking in the middle of the road, and most countries chose the sidewalk, which is expectable, but some followed the Americans (they are looking for a stolen car) to the middle of the road. Middle of the road is perilous, and you do it only if you have some interest in doing so.
I find it quite funny that if someone agrees on us policy, then they are kissing ass, while those that kisses the french ass and supports their economic goals are considered to make independent decisions.
This decision was not about something where both options are equally attractive. This was choosing to walk on the sidewalk versus walking in the middle of the road, and most countries chose the sidewalk, which is expectable, but some followed the Americans (they are looking for a stolen car) to the middle of the road. Middle of the road is perilous, and you do it only if you have some interest in doing so.

I disagree a little since I see it as some accident has happened and some people choose to stay on the sidewalk and just look at the poor victims while others choose to take action and start giving first aid etc despite of the dangers involved.
I have a little difficulty seing what Saddam did to the iraqui people as a stolen car - in my view a more proper picture would be a severe car crash with bodies spread around and people trapped inside burning wretches of cars.
Comment