First, you're applying your judgment to other people :nonono:
Second, you ignored the rest of my post.
Third, if Apple fails to provide compatibility measures to developers to keep programs functioning from 10.0 to 10.4, then Apple has failed and if they are there, but they don't educate their developers then they have partly failed. It can only benefit the user to have software working from 10.0 to 10.4, but no, that's not the way it is and it's a problem for Apple, because soon people won't accept that and start pirating their OS.
Win 95 was 10 years ago. 10.2 was yesterday.
Second, you ignored the rest of my post.
Third, if Apple fails to provide compatibility measures to developers to keep programs functioning from 10.0 to 10.4, then Apple has failed and if they are there, but they don't educate their developers then they have partly failed. It can only benefit the user to have software working from 10.0 to 10.4, but no, that's not the way it is and it's a problem for Apple, because soon people won't accept that and start pirating their OS.
Microsoft is also responsible for those evil people who won't make things that are compatible with Win 95...
Comment