Originally posted by germanos
This is why I have never understand Economics:
a desaster like this could in fact be a boost to the economy.
Does this mean that wealth and well-being has nothing to do with economics? In fact that wealth and well-being are opposites of a healthy economy?
This is why I have never understand Economics:
a desaster like this could in fact be a boost to the economy.
Does this mean that wealth and well-being has nothing to do with economics? In fact that wealth and well-being are opposites of a healthy economy?
Comment