Let's limit this thread to that particular discussion.
My piece:
While Global Warming is part of Earth's natural ebb and flow and there are questions about how much Humanity has influenced it, there is no way to prove or disprove that Human activities had anything to do with this hurricane. It's been known for a long time that this day would come. As I have said elsewhere, the city of New Orleans was living on borrowed time: A direct hit on the city was inevitable. That it is a C5 and not a C1 for instance is merely (very bad) luck of the draw. Humanity's presence and meddling in nature will be much more quantifiable in the toxic aftermath. Will this turn the heat up on the debate over Global Warming and environmental degredation in general? I certainly hope so, though it's probably much too late to avert the changes that are already occuring, regardless of whether they started with or without our influence.
My piece:
While Global Warming is part of Earth's natural ebb and flow and there are questions about how much Humanity has influenced it, there is no way to prove or disprove that Human activities had anything to do with this hurricane. It's been known for a long time that this day would come. As I have said elsewhere, the city of New Orleans was living on borrowed time: A direct hit on the city was inevitable. That it is a C5 and not a C1 for instance is merely (very bad) luck of the draw. Humanity's presence and meddling in nature will be much more quantifiable in the toxic aftermath. Will this turn the heat up on the debate over Global Warming and environmental degredation in general? I certainly hope so, though it's probably much too late to avert the changes that are already occuring, regardless of whether they started with or without our influence.
Comment