Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Another planet(oid)!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Calling the Moon 'Luna'.

    Comment


    • #17
      There are many moons. Luna seems like a great name for the moon of our planet.

      I thought anything large enough to be spherical under its own gravity and circling a star in its own orbital plane was a planet. This definition excludes comets, asteroids, moons, and Kuiper belt objects.


      Again, I don't think it's a fair definition. what about planets that are left behind disappearing stars? are they not planets anymore?
      urgh.NSFW

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Az
        Again, I don't think it's a fair definition. what about planets that are left behind disappearing stars? are they not planets anymore?
        Of course not, they are no longer orbiting a star. I'm not sure what they are called in that instance (a rogue planetoid comes to mind).

        I'd be more concerned about why those stars are disappearing.
        "And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man." -- JFK Inaugural, 1961
        "Extremism in the defense of liberty is not a vice." -- Barry Goldwater, 1964 GOP Nomination acceptance speech (not George W. Bush 40 years later...)
        2004 Presidential Candidate
        2008 Presidential Candidate (for what its worth)

        Comment


        • #19

          Of course not, they are no longer orbiting a star.


          Well, I disagree.

          I'd be more concerned about why those stars are disappearing.


          Not necessarily disappearing completely but possibly losing enough mass so that the planets aren't orbiting them ( after the creation of a nebula, for example )
          urgh.NSFW

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Az

            Of course not, they are no longer orbiting a star.


            Well, I disagree.
            That's okay. The definition is vague enough to make us both right (or wrong).
            "And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man." -- JFK Inaugural, 1961
            "Extremism in the defense of liberty is not a vice." -- Barry Goldwater, 1964 GOP Nomination acceptance speech (not George W. Bush 40 years later...)
            2004 Presidential Candidate
            2008 Presidential Candidate (for what its worth)

            Comment


            • #21
              You could probably get a situation where a red dwarf (star) is orbiting a pair of brown dwarfs (planets... kinda).

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Sandman
                Calling the Moon 'Luna'.
                Agreed. Very pretentious

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Sandman
                  You could probably get a situation where a red dwarf (star) is orbiting a pair of brown dwarfs (planets... kinda).
                  Brown dwarfs stretch the definition even further. Extra large planets can be considered failed stars so your example could also represent a trinary system.
                  "And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man." -- JFK Inaugural, 1961
                  "Extremism in the defense of liberty is not a vice." -- Barry Goldwater, 1964 GOP Nomination acceptance speech (not George W. Bush 40 years later...)
                  2004 Presidential Candidate
                  2008 Presidential Candidate (for what its worth)

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    IIRC, that wouldn't include the center of mass in either between the planets, or in the star, making it a tertiary system.
                    urgh.NSFW

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Vince278


                      Brown dwarfs stretch the definition even further.

                      Hmmm....


                      Brown dwarf in the ring
                      Tra la la la la
                      There's a brown dwarf in the ring
                      Tra la la la la la
                      Brown dwarfl in the ring
                      Tra la la la la
                      She looks like a sugar in a plum
                      Plum plum

                      Show me your motion
                      Tra la la la la
                      Come on show me your planetary motion
                      Tra la la la la la
                      Show me your planetary motion
                      Tra la la la la
                      She looks like a sugar in a plum
                      Plum plum
                      Attached Files
                      Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                      ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                      Comment


                      • #26

                        Brown dwarfs stretch the definition even further. Extra large planets can be considered failed stars so your example could also represent a trinary system.

                        ARGGHHHH. longest X-post ever.
                        urgh.NSFW

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          A rose planet by any other name....
                          One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Calling objects pluto size or larger planets is fine by me. Calling anything smaller a planetoid is fine also.

                            In order for us to call something a planet. Criteria should be,

                            It has to revolve around the sun
                            It has to have a diameter of 1000km or more

                            There. I think I settled it. Lets start burning our space history books now and make new ones

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by faded glory
                              It has to revolve around the sun
                              It has to have a diameter of 1000km or more
                              1. Why 1000km?
                              2. We've discovered lots of extrasolar planets and none of them revolve around the sun.
                              "And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man." -- JFK Inaugural, 1961
                              "Extremism in the defense of liberty is not a vice." -- Barry Goldwater, 1964 GOP Nomination acceptance speech (not George W. Bush 40 years later...)
                              2004 Presidential Candidate
                              2008 Presidential Candidate (for what its worth)

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                can we name this one planet X?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X