I concede to the mighty Phil. His blurry, wet upper lip and huge watch are just overpowering.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Beatles Vs. Phil Collins
Collapse
X
-
~ If Tehben spits eggs at you, jump on them and throw them back. ~ Eventis ~ Eventis Dungeons & Dragons 6th Age Campaign: Chapter 1, Chapter 2, Chapter 3, Chapter 4: (Unspeakable) Horror on the Hill ~
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cort Haus
Your taste is crap. Your ignorance doesn't impress me.
You clearly no nothing about musical ability.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brachy-Pride
Phil collins alone is greater than Ringo alone, and George alone for sure.
This is clearly madness."My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
"The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud
Comment
-
Re: The Beatles Vs. Phil Collins
Originally posted by Ninot
Friend and I are having a silly infantile debate, so I wanna see what Apolyton has to say.
For whatever reason you deem valid, who was better (in their prime), The Beatles, or Phil Collins(with or without Genesis)?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dis
You'll have to prove to me they are talented. it's pop music. It's all it is. They couldn't even hope to match the complexity and talent of classical music.
Classical music is about melody and harmony on the western scale. At least it was until the 20th century, where in an attempt to break new ground these essentials were ignored when the composers threw out the baby with the bath water. The Beatles returned to classical music's traditions with strength of melody and depth of harmony.
The songwiting and arrangements of The Beatles is actually far more sophisticated than most 'pop' bands, which is why it's not true to dismiss it as 'only pop'. The intro to 'I am the Walrus' has over a dozen chords, for example, which is not characteristic of popo intros.
Even their early, relatively simple poppy stuff has very complex guitar arrangements that require two guitars working together harmonically. Most pop songs can be played on a single guitar and a single voice without losing the feel of the song. Beatles stuff just doesn't sound right unless the harmonies of guitars and vocals are there.
To say that they are not talented is like saying that Michael Schumacher can't drive.
Anyway, no-one is trying to say that the Beatles are better than J.S Bach, just better than Phil Collins.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brachy-Pride
Phil collins alone is greater than Ringo alone, and George alone for sure.
But it is hard to say who is greater from Phil, Paul and John.
It has been said that Ringo Starr was not only not the best drummer in the world, he was not even the best drummer in The Beatles. As far as drumming goes, Phil Collins takes the points, but The Beatles were not about drumming, they were about song-writing and arrangements. Phil Collins as a solo artist is not about drumming, but about song-writing and arrangements. This is the ground to be contested.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cort Haus
Beatles.
Phil Collins
Attempts to compare the two.
Posting ultra-wide pictures just to be childish and extremely annoying.~ If Tehben spits eggs at you, jump on them and throw them back. ~ Eventis ~ Eventis Dungeons & Dragons 6th Age Campaign: Chapter 1, Chapter 2, Chapter 3, Chapter 4: (Unspeakable) Horror on the Hill ~
Comment
-
I don't think many of you give Harrison his due.Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead
Comment
-
Originally posted by SlowwHand
I don't think many of you give Harrison his due.Resident Filipina Lady Boy Expert.
Comment
-
Ginger Baker.Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead
Comment
Comment