Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Iranian President - 1979 Hostage Taker?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Iranian President - 1979 Hostage Taker?

    Ex-Hostages Say Iran Leader Was a Captor
    By RUSS BYNUM, Associated Press Writer
    40 minutes ago

    A quarter-century after they were taken captive in Iran, five former American hostages say they got an unexpected reminder of their 444-day ordeal in the bearded face of Iran's new president-elect.

    Watching coverage of Iran's presidential election on television dredged up 25-year-old memories that prompted four of the former hostages to exchange e-mails. And those four realized they shared the same conclusion — the firm belief that President-elect Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had been one of their Iranian captors.

    "This is the guy. There's no question about it," said former hostage Chuck Scott, a retired Army colonel who lives in Jonesboro, Ga. "You could make him a blond and shave his whiskers, put him in a zoot suit and I'd still spot him."

    Scott and former hostages David Roeder, William J. Daugherty and Don A. Sharer told The Associated Press on Wednesday they have no doubt Ahmadinejad, 49, was one of the hostage-takers. A fifth ex-hostage, Kevin Hermening, said he reached the same conclusion after looking at photos.

    Not everyone agrees. Former hostage and retired Air Force Col. Thomas E. Schaefer said he doesn't recognize Ahmadinejad, by face or name, as one of his captors.

    Several former students among the hostage-takers also said Ahmadinejad did not participate. And a close aide to Ahmadinejad denied the president-elect took part in the seizure of the embassy or in holding Americans hostage.

    Militant students seized the U.S. Embassy in Tehran on Nov. 4, 1979, and held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days to protest Washington's refusal to hand over the U.S.-backed Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi for trial. The shah fled Iran earlier that year after he was overthrown by the Islamic Revolution.

    The aide, Meisan Rowhani, told the AP from Tehran that Ahmadinejad was asked during recent private meetings if he had a role in the hostage taking. Rowhani said he replied, "No. I believed that if we do that the world will swallow us."

    Another former hostage, Paul Lewis, said he thought Ahmadinejad looked vaguely familiar when he saw a picture of him on the news last week, but the former Marine embassy guard said he could not be certain.

    "My memories were more of the gun barrel, not the people behind it," Lewis said.

    Scott and Roeder both said they were sure Ahmadinejad was present while they were interrogated.

    "I can absolutely guarantee you he was not only one of the hostage-takers, he was present at my personal interrogation," Roeder said in an interview from his home in Pinehurst, N.C.

    Daugherty, who worked for the CIA in Iran and now lives in Savannah, said a man he's convinced was Ahmadinejad was among a group of ringleaders escorting a Vatican representative during a visit in the early days of the hostage crisis.

    "It's impossible to forget a guy like that," Daugherty said. "Clearly the way he acted, the fact he gave orders, that he was older, most certainly he was one of the ringleaders."

    Ahmadinejad, the hard-line mayor of Tehran, was declared winner Wednesday of Iran's presidential runoff election, defeating one of Iran's best-known statesmen, Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani. The stunning upset put conservatives firmly in control of all branches of power in the Islamic Republic of Iran.

    Scott, Roeder, Daugherty and Sharer said they have been exchanging e-mails since seeing Ahmadinejad emerge as a serious contender in Iran's elections.

    "He was extremely cruel," said Sharer, of Bedford, Ind. "He's one of the hard-liners. So that tells you where their government's going to stand for the next four to five years."

    After seeing recent newspaper photos, Sharer said, "I don't have any doubts" that Ahmadinejad was a hostage-taker.

    A memory expert cautioned that people who discuss their recollections can influence one another in reinforcing false memories. Also, it's harder to identify from memory someone of a different race or ethnicity, said psychologist Elizabeth Loftus of the University of California, Irvine.

    "Twenty-five years is an awfully long time," Loftus said. "Of course we can't say this is false, but these things can lead people down the path of having a false memory."

    Schaefer, of Peoria, Ariz., didn't recognize Ahmadinejad and said allegations that he had been a hostage-taker don't concern him as much as knowing hard-liners are back in power in Iran.

    Scott gave a detailed account of the man he recalled as Ahmadinejad, saying he appeared to be a security chief among the hostage-takers.

    "He kind of stayed in the background most of the time," Scott said. "But he was in on some of the interrogations. And he was in on my interrogation at the time they were working me over."

    Scott also recalled an incident while he was held in the Evin prison in north Tehran in the summer of 1980.

    One of the guards, whom Scott called Akbar, would sometimes let Scott and Sharer out to walk the narrow, 20-foot hallway outside their cells, he said. One day, Scott said, the man he believes was Ahmadinejad saw them walking and chastised the guard.

    "He was the security chief, supposedly," Scott said. "When he found out Akbar had let us out of our cells at all, he chewed out Akbar. I speak Farsi. He said, `These guys are dogs they're pigs, they're animals. They don't deserve to be let out of their cells.'"

    Scott recalled responding to the man's stare by openly cursing his captor in Farsi. "He looked a little flustered like he didn't know what to do. He just walked out."

    Roeder said he's sure Ahmadinejad was present during one of his interrogations when the hostage-takers threatened to kidnap his son in the U.S. and "start sending pieces — toes and fingers of my son — to my wife."

    "It was almost like he was checking on the interrogation techniques they were using in a sort of adviser capacity," Roeder said.

    Hermening, of Mosinee, Wis., the youngest of the hostages, said that after he looked at photos and did research on the Internet, he came to the conclusion that Ahmadinejad was one of his questioners.

    Hermening had been Marine guard at the embassy, and he recalled the man he believes was Ahmadinejad asking him for the combination to a safe.

    "His English would have been fairly strong. I couldn't say that about all the guards," Hermening said. "I remember that he was certainly direct, threatening, very unfriendly."

    Rowhani, the aide to Ahmadinejad, said Ahmadinejad said during the recent meeting that he stopped opposing the embassy seizure after the revolution's leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, expressed support for it. But the president-elect said he never took part.

    "Definitely he was not among the students who took part in the seizure," said Abbas Abdi, the leader of the hostage-takers. Abdi has since become a leading supporter of reform and sharply opposed Ahmadinejad. "He was not part of us. He played no role in the seizure, let alone being responsible for security" for the students.

    Another of the hostage-takers, Bijan Abidi, said Ahmadinejad "was not involved. There was no one by that name among the students who took part in the U.S. Embassy seizure."

    ___

    Associated Press writers Aaron Beard in Raleigh, N.C., Amanda Keim in Phoenix, Deanna Wrenn in Indianapolis, Robert Imrie in Wausau, Wis., and Anna Johnson in Chicago contributed to this report.

  • #2
    damn gina. if this is true.
    "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

    Comment


    • #3
      Well, I guess we won't be normalizing relations any time soon.

      Still, "Current leader participated in country's popular revolution" is more dog-bites-man than man-bites-dog.
      "I have as much authority as the pope. I just don't have as many people who believe it." — George Carlin

      Comment


      • #4
        Wow. How irrelevant.
        If you don't like reality, change it! me
        "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
        "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
        "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

        Comment


        • #5
          The rhetoric against Iran seems to be picking up latley. Those ****ers in Washington had better not be trying anything.
          We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

          Comment


          • #6
            The most they could do is try to get the Europeans to impose some sanctions. Otherwise, there is not much the US could do, since the Chinese and Russians would probably block any UN measure, and one hopes the admin. is not so monumnetally stupid as to think they could attack Iran at this point, with the situation in Iraq being what it is.
            If you don't like reality, change it! me
            "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
            "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
            "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

            Comment


            • #7
              Bush is probably upset not because of the pain Iraq is causing everybody, but because it limits his options in dealing with Iran.

              The are pretty monumentally stupid though, and that part scares me.
              We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Ted Striker
                Bush is probably upset not because of the pain Iraq is causing everybody, but because it limits his options in dealing with Iran.
                That's one of my problems with it.
                I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                Comment


                • #9
                  Yep, Iraq pretty much limits our options to do much of anything with regards to anybody.


                  That's why you don't go looking for trouble because trouble comes looking for you.

                  For example, 9/11 was unexpected, but we had the capacity to deal with it, and reacted to it.
                  We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Ted Striker
                    The are pretty monumentally stupid though, and that part scares me.
                    They? Or We?
                    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      They - The Bush Administration, not including the American People and/or Ted Striker

                      damn lawyers
                      We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The American people elected the Bush Administration, however, and gave him a Republican majority in both houses.
                        “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                        - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Rufus T. Firefly
                          Well, I guess we won't be normalizing relations any time soon.

                          Still, "Current leader participated in country's popular revolution" is more dog-bites-man than man-bites-dog.
                          Why not? We have had normalized relations with plenty of other undemocratic rulers.


                          Oh wait -- it's because this time it was Americans who were victims, and not the native people.
                          A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Ted Striker
                            Bush is probably upset not because of the pain Iraq is causing everybody, but because it limits his options in dealing with Iran.

                            The are pretty monumentally stupid though, and that part scares me.
                            a conventional invasion of Iran would be a mistake even if we had not a single soldier in Iraq. Look at the size of the place, the total population, the difficulties to geographic access to main population centers. Our advantage, if neocons like Ledeen and Amir Taheri are to be believed (folks I know can vouch for that, as far Teheran is concerned, at least), is a population that is hostile to the mullahs - an advantage likely to be lost in any US invasion. It would be necessary to leverage that advantage in some other fashion.

                            A hard line Iran govt is likely to push the EU 3 in the direction of the US, a good thing in and of itself. As Ge says, the proposed direction is sanctions. Ge has stated he thinks that would be unimportant. Reports on this recent election suggest great concern about the economy.
                            "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Rufus T. Firefly
                              Well, I guess we won't be normalizing relations any time soon.

                              Still, "Current leader participated in country's popular revolution" is more dog-bites-man than man-bites-dog.
                              This is more than a little glib description for what went down.
                              I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X