Group attempting to sieze Supreme court Justice, David H. Souter's home for "economic revitiliation"
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oh Sweet Sweet Sweet Justice! The System Works!!!!
Collapse
X
-
EXCEPT that their ruling did not make such a distinction.
There was nothing in the ruling that said that it can't target against a specific individual-it only mentions that the goverment has a right, via eminent domain to take someones property, giving them "market value" for it, for the purpose of economic enchament.
This is in Mass., the most liberal and sane(There is north east liberalism that believes in things like compassion, equality, charity and justice and west coast liberalism like California, i.e.-insane) state in the country, if the town goverment is indicative of the rest of the state, they will surley pass this proposal, just to spite him.
Why not? They didn't have anything in the ruling that it can't be targeted against an individual..... what is he going to do if he dosen't like it, bring it to the supreme court?
Oh wait.......
In my nightly prayers, I will include a prayer hoping for sucess in this.
Comment
-
They didn't need to make the distinction in the ruling, since there's already plenty of decisional law regarding local zoning and planning processes, the definition of public benefit, etc. SCOTUS opinions are a few pages, not encyclopedias.When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Comment
-
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged."meet the new boss, same as the old boss
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vesayen
It does not matter Michael, all they need is the town goverment to make a completley arbitrary decision. Really the only way they could be stopped from doing this by external pressure would be to impeach them.
It's mildly entertaining posturing, but that's all. A non-issue otherwise.When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Comment
-
And don't forget a local government wouldn't be willing to spend the amount of money it would take to use eminent domain on a house of a Supreme Court Justice. Especially not to prove a political point. That ain't cheap.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
Comment