Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

screw human rights - China is a menace to humanity!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • screw human rights - China is a menace to humanity!

    Bird Flu Drug Rendered Useless
    Chinese Chickens Given Medication Made for Humans


    By Alan Sipress
    Washington Post Foreign Service
    Saturday, June 18, 2005; A01


    HONG KONG -- Chinese farmers, acting with the approval and encouragement of government officials, have tried to suppress major bird flu outbreaks among chickens with an antiviral drug meant for humans, animal health experts said. International researchers now conclude that this is why the drug will no longer protect people in case of a worldwide bird flu epidemic.

    China's use of the drug amantadine, which violated international livestock guidelines, was widespread years before China acknowledged any infection of its poultry, according to pharmaceutical company executives and veterinarians.

    Since January 2004, avian influenza has spread across nine East Asian countries, devastating poultry flocks and killing at least 54 people in Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam, but none in China. World Health Organization officials warned the virus could easily undergo genetic changes to create a strain capable of killing tens of millions of people worldwide.

    Although China did not report an avian influenza outbreak until February 2004, executives at Chinese pharmaceutical companies and veterinarians said farmers were widely using the drug to control the virus in the late 1990s.

    The Chinese Agriculture Ministry approved the production and sale of the drug for use in chickens, according to officials from the Chinese pharmaceutical industry and the government, although such use is barred in the United States and many other countries. Local government veterinary stations instructed Chinese farmers on how to use the drug and at times supplied it, animal health experts said.

    Amantadine is one of two types of medication for treating human influenza. But researchers determined last year that the H5N1 bird flu strain circulating in Vietnam and Thailand, the two countries hardest hit by the virus, had become resistant, leaving only an alternative drug that is difficult to produce in large amounts and much less affordable, especially for developing countries in Southeast Asia.

    "It's definitely an issue if there's a pandemic. Amantadine is off the table," said Richard Webby, an influenza expert at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis.

    Health experts outside China previously said they suspected the virus's resistance to the medicine was linked to drug use at poultry farms but were unable to confirm the practice inside the country. Influenza researchers at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in particular, have collected information about amantadine use from Chinese Web sites but have been frustrated in their efforts to learn more on the ground.

    China has previously run afoul of international agencies for its response to public and agricultural health crises, notably the SARS epidemic that began in 2002. China's health minister was fired after the government acknowledged it had covered up the extent of the SARS outbreak by preventing state-run media from reporting about the disease for months and by minimizing its seriousness.

    In interviews, executives at Chinese pharmaceutical companies confirmed that the drug had been used since the late 1990s, to treat chickens sickened by bird flu and to prevent healthy ones from catching it.

    "Amantadine is widely used in the entire country," said Zhang Libin, head of the veterinary medicine division of Northeast General Pharmaceutical Factory in Shenyang. He added, "Many pharmaceutical factories around China produce amantadine, and farmers can buy it easily in veterinary medicine stores."

    Zhang and other animal health experts said the drug was used by small, private farms and larger commercial ones. Amantadine sells for about $10 a pound, a fraction of the drug's cost in Europe and the United States, where its price would be prohibitive for all but human consumption.

    Two months before China first reported a bird flu outbreak in poultry to the World Animal Health Organization in February 2004, officials had begun a massive campaign to immunize poultry against the virus. They have now used at least 2.6 billion doses of a vaccine.

    But researchers in Hong Kong have reported that the H5N1 flu virus has been circulating in mainland China for at least eight years and that Chinese farms suffered major outbreaks in 1997, 2001 and 2003. Scientists have traced the virus that has devastated farms across Southeast Asia in the last two years to a strain isolated from a goose in China's Guangdong province in 1996.

    The U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization has long recommended that countries try to eradicate infectious animal diseases by slaughtering infected flocks and increasing safety measures on farms. Last year, the FAO also suggested that countries consider vaccinating their poultry against bird flu. But the guidelines never recommended the use of antiviral drugs such as amantadine, which, unlike vaccination, has been proven to make viruses resistant, officials said.

    In 1987, researchers at a U.S. Department of Agriculture laboratory demonstrated that bird flu viruses developed drug resistance within a matter of days when infected chickens received amantadine.

    Still, a veterinarian with personal knowledge of livestock practices across China said Chinese farmers responded to the bird flu outbreak by putting the drug into their chickens' drinking water. The veterinarian asked that his name not be published because he feared for his livelihood.

    "This would explain why we're seeing such high resistance levels," said Michael T. Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota. While various antibiotics have lost their effectiveness because of overuse, he said, the emergence of resistance to amantadine is unprecedented because it is an antiviral.

    "This is the first example of an antiviral drug that was used for animal production that has major implications for human health," Osterholm said.

    A popular Chinese handbook, titled Medicine Pamphlet for Animals and Poultry, provides farmers and livestock officials with specific prescriptions for amantadine use to treat chickens and ferrets with respiratory viruses. The manual, written by a professor at the People's Liberation Army Agriculture and Husbandry University and issued by a military-owned publishing company, prescribes 0.025 grams of amantadine for each kilogram of chicken body weight.

    Farmers also use the drug to prevent healthy chickens from catching bird flu, giving it to their poultry about once a month or more often when the weather is liable to change and chickens are considered susceptible to illness, veterinary experts said. The antiviral is often mixed with Chinese herbs, vitamins and other medicine.

    In the United States, amantadine was approved in 1976 by the Food and Drug Administration for treating influenza in adults. Amantadine and it sister drug, rimantadine, known collectively as amantadines, work by preventing a flu virus from reproducing itself. Both are now ineffective against the H5N1 strain.

    International health experts stressed that amantadine could have been vital in stanching the spread of the bird flu virus in the early weeks of an epidemic.

    Now, the only alternative is oseltamivir and closely related zanamivir, which stop the flu virus from leaving infected cells and attacking new ones. Oseltamivir is easier to use and has far greater sales.

    "Amantadine is the cheapest drug against flu," said Malik Peiris, an influenza expert at the University of Hong Kong. "It is much more affordable for many countries of the region. Now, it is clearly no longer an option."


    Special correspondents Ling Jin in Beijing and K.C. Ng in Hong Kong contributed to this report.

    © 2005 The Washington Post Company


    Great, I guess the Chinese weren't conent ****ing up the environment worse than anyone else! Now, they have to be so reckless and irresponsible as to risk millions of lives in the event of an epidemic, too! There has got to be some way to get China to actually stop ****ing around like this.

  • #2
    It must be Bush's fault.
    Founder of The Glory of War, CHAMPIONS OF APOLYTON!!!
    1992-Perot , 1996-Perot , 2000-Bush , 2004-Bush :|, 2008-Obama :|, 2012-Obama , 2016-Clinton , 2020-Biden

    Comment


    • #3
      Well, the west has already done the same to make sure we have lots of multiresistant bacteria around. The Chinese are just helping us out now making viruses resistant too
      The enemy cannot push a button if you disable his hand.

      Comment


      • #4
        Unfortunately, the Chinese are not the only ones using drugs on animals. Lots of antibiotics are used on livestock in order to prevent (not even cure) diseases, thereby augmenting the resistance of many bacteria to these antibiotics...
        Clash of Civilization team member
        (a civ-like game whose goal is low micromanagement and good AI)
        web site http://clash.apolyton.net/frame/index.shtml and forum here on apolyton)

        Comment


        • #5
          .

          Comment


          • #6
            I think I'll get a bucket O chicken tonight. Been a while.
            Long time member @ Apolyton
            Civilization player since the dawn of time

            Comment


            • #7
              Kuci, there's also plenty of unnecessary use of antibiotics on humans: http://www.iatrogenic.org/library/antibioticlib.html
              (picture refers to the situation in the US)
              Attached Files
              The enemy cannot push a button if you disable his hand.

              Comment


              • #8
                China presents a wonderful opportunity for practicing past. present, and future tense.

                They suck. They have sucked. They will always suck.
                Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
                "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
                He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

                Comment


                • #9
                  Don't get the thread title, though... why "screw human rights?" Are you suggesting genocide on the Chinese or something?
                  Tutto nel mondo è burla

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I think he's suggesting that the PRC's human rights violations are small fry compared to this.
                    Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

                    It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
                    The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Hmmm, large concentrations of animals and people in a small space..yup, the right recipe for mayor epidemics.

                      Maybe its a terrible ploy by the Chinese, start a horrible epidemic that will kill millions, but since China has so many more people than anyone but India, BAM! Victory by depopulation!


                      If you don't like reality, change it! me
                      "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
                      "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
                      "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        What are you rolleyesing at?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: screw human rights - China is a menace to humanity!

                          Originally posted by Kuciwalker
                          Great, I guess the Chinese weren't conent ****ing up the environment worse than anyone else! Now, they have to be so reckless and irresponsible as to risk millions of lives in the event of an epidemic, too! There has got to be some way to get China to actually stop ****ing around like this.
                          Very true on the virus, but China wrecking the environment worse than anyone else? Since when are their emissions as high as the US?

                          But yes, the world should enforce some safeguards on actions that affect everyone. Pollution, and disease doesn't respect national boundaries, and needs to be tackled by the whole world.
                          Smile
                          For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
                          But he would think of something

                          "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Re: screw human rights - China is a menace to humanity!

                            Originally posted by Drogue
                            Very true on the virus, but China wrecking the environment worse than anyone else? Since when are their emissions as high as the US?
                            You know, environmental damage isn't measured solely in CO2 emissions...

                            AIUI, they have a lot more pollution than any of the developed nations.

                            But yes, the world should enforce some safeguards on actions that affect everyone. Pollution, and disease doesn't respect national boundaries, and needs to be tackled by the whole world.
                            The worst part is, there are these safeguards, and the Chinese ignored them.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Re: Re: screw human rights - China is a menace to humanity!

                              Originally posted by Kuciwalker
                              You know, environmental damage isn't measured solely in CO2 emissions...

                              AIUI, they have a lot more pollution than any of the developed nations.
                              It isn't, but IIRC, the US still has the largest amounts of carbon monoxide, sulphur, etc. Ammonia China may have more off, but I though the US had the largest share of the rest.

                              Originally posted by Kuciwalker
                              The worst part is, there are these safeguards, and the Chinese ignored them.
                              Hence the word enforce. I'd favour trade restrictions or tariffs with any nation that breaks international code on things that affect the whole world (pollution, disease and terrorism is all I can think of).
                              Smile
                              For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
                              But he would think of something

                              "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X