Apolytoner's Hall of Fame: June 2005

[Paddy]

how do you work that out SB?

[self biased]

heheh... long long story involving another poster and myself. in a nutshell we were the first to meet on apolyton and date. i stopped using the legend title after we split up because i deemed it improper. she still uses it, however.

[Paddy]

ahhh thanks for the clarification

[Pyrodrew]

Mr.Tuberski - 4pts (he's the only one at 1pt and at the bottom... and "-ski" people are just... super )

Are you sure we cannot assign negative points?

Otherwise, I'm in Che's club against this popularity contest... ...that was until he caved. That's what I get for believing in an ideal by a communist. So now I'm only against Che.

[DarkCloud]

Stefu- that's because more than 12 were inaugurated some years. The goal of the hall is to remain slightly exclusive and only admit 12 per year.

By accident, we have 67 members from 2000-2004 when we should only have 48. Some of the extras were due to posthumous inductions (3), one was due to an accidental tie (1). I have no idea where the others came from. Thus, I'm trying to slow down the induction process so that we retain quality in the hall. This year only 9-10 will be inducted, next year will be the same (probably); after that, we'll get back on track!

[Addled Platypus]

SO... I can practice my pandering, cool

[Jaguar]

I think we 2000ers should get to vote for four people at some point, maybe the year after next.

[Urban Ranger]

What, Ned got upset because nobody voted for him?

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by DarkCloud
Eh, I don't know. I mean, that really makes it impossible to get elected without the support of the older people.

To be in the Hall of Fame, a Polytubbie should have good support and recognition across the board, which should include some of us geezers So I don't see that as a handicap for newcomers.

If somebody has been extraordinary, well, I don't think it will take years for him (or her) to be recognised.

[OzzyKP]

More votes for old timers

In fact I say we just raise the voting age here on the forum to 3 years. No one should be allowed to vote until they've been here at least 3 years. They just don't have the experience on the boards necessary to cast an informed ballot.

[Tassadar500]

Originally posted by OzzyKP
More votes for old timers

In fact I say we just raise the voting age here on the forum to 3 years. No one should be allowed to vote until they've been here at least 3 years. They just don't have the experience on the boards necessary to cast an informed ballot.

I support this.

[Brtndr4u]

Fez
Dark Cloud
Urban Ranger

[Alexander's Horse]

Originally posted by self biased


there's only two people who can claim the title of legend, and i'm one of them.

You were of course the other person I was thinking of

[Lancer]

Ned should definately stick around. His contribution to the OT is huge.

[Paddy]

Ned, how did you get out of Victoria old chap?