Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
Nixon's facility with breakins and other little details long predates Dean. Go back to his campaigns against Jerry Voorhis and Helen Gehagan Douglas.
wrt the comparison of Clinton and Nixon, Clinton's obstruction/whatever was related to getting blowjobs from an intern. Nixon's was in regard to one incident that was a culmination of a pattern of government employees and contractors engaging in multiple illegal acts in furtherance of Nixon's personal political agenda.
The underlying acts are about as comparable in scale as a crackhead and John Gotti.
Nixon's facility with breakins and other little details long predates Dean. Go back to his campaigns against Jerry Voorhis and Helen Gehagan Douglas.
wrt the comparison of Clinton and Nixon, Clinton's obstruction/whatever was related to getting blowjobs from an intern. Nixon's was in regard to one incident that was a culmination of a pattern of government employees and contractors engaging in multiple illegal acts in furtherance of Nixon's personal political agenda.
The underlying acts are about as comparable in scale as a crackhead and John Gotti.
2) What Clinton did was to obstruct a lawful investigation into whether he sexually harrassed Paula Jones. What Nixon did was to attempt to obstruct (unsuccessful) an investigation into the Watergate buglary by the FBI. The two are comparable in that both are illegal and neither has any justification whatsoever.
Comment