Given that the server is based in the states? Do you think we could use the US Freedom of Information Act to force the admins to publish the logs?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Access to Ban Logs
Collapse
X
-
without knowing much about US laws, in fact with knowledge based solely on watching Law & Order, i would thing the Freed of Information Act is about state dataCo-Founder, Apolyton Civilization Site
Co-Owner/Webmaster, Top40-Charts.com | CTO, Apogee Information Systems
giannopoulos.info: my non-mobile non-photo news & articles blog
-
The UK act applies to all public bodies which is very widely interpreted. Given your status as the worlds premier civ site, I suspect you would qualify as a public body in the UK.
Anyway, you would have to release extracts under the Data Protection Act.
Any hotshot US lawyers know the answer to this?(+1)
Comment
-
Here's a good blurb on it from the Department of Justice:
Like all federal agencies, the Department of Justice (DOJ) generally is required under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to disclose records requested in writing by any person. However, agencies may withhold information pursuant to nine exemptions and three exclusions contained in the statute. The FOIA applies only to federal agencies and does not create a right of access to records held by Congress, the courts, or by state or local government agencies. Each state has its own public access laws that should be consulted for access to state and local records.The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.
The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.
Comment
-
Originally posted by spartak
Given that the server is based in the states? Do you think we could use the US Freedom of Information Act to force the admins to publish the logs?
I'm no expert on US laws, but I think the American Freedom of Information Act only applies to government agencies, not private organisations.
I'm aware of a similar UK act which does apply to private organisations, but they are only obliged to disclose information that applies to the individual that requests it. I.o.w. you can ask if and why you were banned yourself, but not about other people.
Even without knowing the details it's obvious that neither Act would requires all organisations to disclose all their information. Information is probably the most valuable commodity of our time, that would effectively be enforcing sort of a post-modern communism.
I'm sure some people would like to see such a thing, but that just isn't going to happen...
Comment
-
Originally posted by spartak
I think you are confusing the UK Data Protection Act and the Freedom of Information Act.
If Britain had dediced to implement informational communism I'm sure I, as someone who studies Information Science, would've heard about it
Comment
-
Originally posted by spartak
The UK act applies to all public bodies which is very widely interpreted. Given your status as the worlds premier civ site, I suspect you would qualify as a public body in the UK.
Anyway, you would have to release extracts under the Data Protection Act.
The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland
Comment
-
i think we solved this...
i'm transfering the thread to OT in case you want to continue this incredibly interesting discussion on the differences and similarities of the acts in the UK and USCo-Founder, Apolyton Civilization Site
Co-Owner/Webmaster, Top40-Charts.com | CTO, Apogee Information Systems
giannopoulos.info: my non-mobile non-photo news & articles blog
Comment
-
Originally posted by spartak
Yes I know. I was just providing an example to illustrate my ignorance and for all I knew the UK act was based onm the US act.
After all the US is the only country that actively exports their laws to other sovereign states.The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.
The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.
Comment
-
Comment