Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Suck it, Tom Delay

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    alea jacta est.
    sic transit gloria mundi
    Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
    Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
    "Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
    From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"

    Comment


    • #62
      Q, you earned this for that brutal pimpslap of Ned:

      "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
      "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Oerdin
        I also think Tom Delay is a dirt bag for gerrymandering all of the Congressional districts in TexaS IN order to prevent fair elections. There is winning elections because you have better ideas and then there is corruptly rigging everything in order to prevent competitive elections. Unfortunately, such a miscarrage of democracy isn't illegal in this country.
        Um... why weren't you up in arms when the Dems did this for close to 100 years? Is it just because it's Delay?

        The Texas Republican gerrymandering is no worse than what the Dems did before. What goes around, comes around.
        “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
        - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
          The Texas Republican gerrymandering is no worse than what the Dems did before. What goes around, comes around.
          Actually, it was, as the Republicans "broke the rules" by gerrymandering outside of the normal time frame. It was mandated that redistricting was only done every 10 years, after a census. The Repubs up and decided to redistrict 2 years later, which is something the Dems had never done and is precisely why they were up in arms over it. Just another example of how the rules need not apply for Delay & Co.
          Tutto nel mondo è burla

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Boris Godunov
            Actually, it was, as the Republicans "broke the rules" by gerrymandering outside of the normal time frame. It was mandated that redistricting was only done every 10 years, after a census. The Repubs up and decided to redistrict 2 years later, which is something the Dems had never done and is precisely why they were up in arms over it. Just another example of how the rules need not apply for Delay & Co.
            Yeah, it's something the Dems haven't done, because they CONTROLED THE GOVERNMENT since the late 1800s! They never had to do so!

            The Republicans came to power for the first time in decades and said, lets give the Dems a taste of their own medicine. More power to 'em. There is no federal law saying redistricting ONLY has to occur after the census. It has just become tradition.
            “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
            - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

            Comment


            • #66
              what about changing the house of reps to proportional national representation? but that would need a constitutional amendment.
              "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

              Comment


              • #67
                Yep... you couldn't get around that except with an amendment. It'd probably never happen. First, it seems too alien. Second, a lot of people like knowing their rep represents their little area and would prefer it to 5 reps representing a much larger area.
                “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
                  There is no federal law saying redistricting ONLY has to occur after the census. It has just become tradition.
                  That's not the point. It was mandated as such under Texas house rules, but the GOP decided to ignore those rules and do their own game.

                  Redistricting after every census makes sense, as you have to reflect the demographics. Redistricting willy-nilly whenever you feel it will give you the optimum political advantage is just dumb, as it will just tell the opposing party to do the same when they return to power. So it's a total **** move.
                  Tutto nel mondo è burla

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Boris Godunov
                    That's not the point. It was mandated as such under Texas house rules, but the GOP decided to ignore those rules and do their own game.
                    Wrong, amateur lawyer, the rule was not invovled since the legislature had failed to do said resdistricting in the first session.
                    Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
                    Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
                    "Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
                    From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      The Republican redistricting drive in Texas is a flagrant power grab, since the current district lines were established only a year ago, by a nonpartisan panel of federal judges, based on the 2000 Census figures. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, a Republican, said the district boundaries could remain in force, as is customary, until the next census in 2010.


                      The redistricting had been done already by a nonpartisan panel in 2000, so another one wasn't due until 2010.

                      And nobody said it was a legal issue, it was an issue of standard practice and policies. The GOP blatantly violated longstanding tradition for a power grab, thus opening the floodgates for retaliation when the pendulum swings the other way.
                      Last edited by Boris Godunov; April 28, 2005, 22:21.
                      Tutto nel mondo è burla

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        DP edit
                        Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
                        Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
                        "Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
                        From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          The was the panel of judges after the legislature failed to pass a plan. The legislature rules only apply the actions of the legislature, twit. The court having made a plan does not count as the legislature having passed a plan. The legislature has duly passed only one redistricting plan since the census. You could have firuged that out, even from a crappy article the world socialist website.
                          Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
                          Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
                          "Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
                          From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            The GOP blatantly violated longstanding tradition for a power grab, thus opening the floodgates for retaliation when the pendulum swings the other way.


                            Again totally ignoring the possibility that this itself was payback for 40+ years of gerrymandering by the Dems, eh Boris?

                            Not that that makes it right, but let's shed a little historical perspective on this.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              And the court passing the plan was a perfectly legitimate way for it to be accomplished under Texas law, given the legislative failure to act. Nothing in the rules says otherwise. If the courts hadn't any jurisdiction, then you might have a point, but otherwise, you don't.

                              Redistricting isn't mandated for the purposes of partisan politics (though it's used as such), it's mandated to more accurately reflect the demographics of the state. So it doesn't matter if the GOP "missed out on their chance" in 2000 or not. Doing an end-run around the established precedent, while legal, was still a blatant power grab.

                              No name calling necessary, see?
                              Tutto nel mondo è burla

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by JohnT
                                Again totally ignoring the possibility that this itself was payback for 40+ years of gerrymandering by the Dems, eh Boris?

                                Not that that makes it right, but let's shed a little historical perspective on this.
                                Nobody denied they hadn't done it before, but again, it was mandated by Texas law to do it every 10 years. Of course the party in power is going to try and gain from it.

                                However, redistricting every time a legislature feels like it is a big difference. The second the Dems get a majority again, they'll have the precedent to do it. It could go on like that forever. Let's see what that does to voter disenfranchisement when nobody knows what the hell district they belong to anymore.
                                Tutto nel mondo è burla

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X