Tweet
Mogens Lykketoft, Denmark's Foreign Minister, has described Israel's targeted killing of Hamas leaders as the moral equivalent of the assassination of Israel's tourism minister Rehavam Ze'evi, has gone on record as stating that it was Israel, not the Palestinians, which was responsible for the violence; and has called for EU economic sanctions against Israel. The Danish General Workers' Union already boycotts Israeli products.
-
Denmark is still nowhere near the US when it comes to blind and unconditional support for Israel. For example, during the 53rd Session of the United Nations General Assembly 1998 - 99, on the 22 resolutions negative or critical of Israel the US voted "no" 17 times (1 yes and 3 abstentions) as opposed to 0 no votes from Denmark.
Mogens Lykketoft, Denmark's Foreign Minister, has described Israel's targeted killing of Hamas leaders as the moral equivalent of the assassination of Israel's tourism minister Rehavam Ze'evi, has gone on record as stating that it was Israel, not the Palestinians, which was responsible for the violence; and has called for EU economic sanctions against Israel. The Danish General Workers' Union already boycotts Israeli products.Click here and here to find out how close the George Washington Bridge came to being blown up on 9/11 and why all evidence against those terrorists was classified. Click here to see the influence of Neocon Zionists in the USA and how they benefitted from 9/11. Remember the USS Liberty and the Lavon Affair. -
Denmark is still nowhere near the US when it comes to blind and unconditional support for Israel. For example, during the 53rd Session of the United Nations General Assembly 1998 - 99, on the 22 resolutions negative or critical of Israel the US voted "no" 17 times (1 yes and 3 abstentions) as opposed to 0 no votes from Denmark.
How does that demonstrate anything as blind and unconditional?
Comment
-
OK, a level of support that approaches being blind and unconditional. The only other no vote in the entire world besides the US's 17 no votes was a single no vote from Micronesia.Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Denmark is still nowhere near the US when it comes to blind and unconditional support for Israel. For example, during the 53rd Session of the United Nations General Assembly 1998 - 99, on the 22 resolutions negative or critical of Israel the US voted "no" 17 times (1 yes and 3 abstentions) as opposed to 0 no votes from Denmark.
How does that demonstrate anything as blind and unconditional?
Click here and here to find out how close the George Washington Bridge came to being blown up on 9/11 and why all evidence against those terrorists was classified. Click here to see the influence of Neocon Zionists in the USA and how they benefitted from 9/11. Remember the USS Liberty and the Lavon Affair.Comment
-
"Mogens Lykketoft, Denmark's Foreign Minister..."
Luckily, this guy is ancient history. He had a brief stint (11 months) as foreign minister in 2000-2001 under the Social Democrat-led government, and later went on to become party leader, but he resigned following a humiliating defeat in the Feb. 2005 general election - managing to land the worst election result for his party in 32 years.
Comment
-
If voting yes about 3/4 of the time counts as blind and unconditional support, then clearly voting no 100% of the time (or more like 95% of the time in the case of Micronesia) count as blind and unconditional enmity?Originally posted by Slaughtermeyer
OK, a level of support that approaches being blind and unconditional. The only other no vote in the entire world besides the US's 17 no votes was a single no vote from Micronesia.Comment
-
-
Well, SID (or 3F as they are named now) tried to start a boycot back in 2002, but I don't think its active anymore.Originally posted by Slaughtermeyer
The Danish General Workers' Union already boycotts Israeli products.
Btw, the name "Danish General Workers' Union" could lead someone to think that they represent most danish workers - they don't. 10 - 15 % is a more correct number.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
Incorrect, in the example I gave it would be the exact opposite, voting no (to resolutions critical of Israel) would mean support of Israel. Voting yes could at least potentially indicate enmity, or even anti-Semitism according to theOriginally posted by Kuciwalker
If voting yes about 3/4 of the time counts as blind and unconditional support, then clearly voting no 100% of the time (or more like 95% of the time in the case of Micronesia) count as blind and unconditional enmity?
Zionist web site where I got those statistics (it states that "Anti-Semitism in the United Nations is also a factor").
In other words, the point I was trying to make was that since Denmark never voted against resolutions critical of Israel, in marked contrast to the USA which voted against them over 3/4 of the time, its attitude towards Israel differs considerably from that of the USA (and opens itself to accusations of being "anti-Semitic").Click here and here to find out how close the George Washington Bridge came to being blown up on 9/11 and why all evidence against those terrorists was classified. Click here to see the influence of Neocon Zionists in the USA and how they benefitted from 9/11. Remember the USS Liberty and the Lavon Affair.Comment
-
Switch the words "yes" and "no" thenOriginally posted by Slaughtermeyer
Incorrect, in the example I gave it would be the exact opposite, voting no (to resolutions critical of Israel) would mean support of Israel. Voting yes could at least potentially indicate enmity, or even anti-Semitism according to the
Zionist web site where I got those statistics (it states that "Anti-Semitism in the United Nations is also a factor").
You also said that the US had blind and unconditional support of Israel... which by your logic, indicates that Denmark is its blind and unconditional enemy.In other words, the point I was trying to make was that since Denmark never voted against resolutions critical of Israel, in marked contrast to the USA which voted against them over 3/4 of the time, its attitude towards Israel differs considerably from that of the USA (and opens itself to accusations of being "anti-Semitic").Comment
-
SiggedOriginally posted by Az
OMG Kuci, you evil zionazi.
Comment
-
That's the risk you have to accept when making independent decisisons.Originally posted by Slaughtermeyer
In other words, the point I was trying to make was that since Denmark never voted against resolutions critical of Israel, in marked contrast to the USA which voted against them over 3/4 of the time, its attitude towards Israel differs considerably from that of the USA (and opens itself to accusations of being "anti-Semitic").
Some even accuses us of being pro-american just because we aren't kneejerk anti-american.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
Or it could also mean (which is what I do indeed mean) that Denmark has a rational and reasonable policy when it comes to Israeli misdeeds, in line with all other European countries, in contrast to US irrationality.[SIZE=1]
You also said that the US had blind and unconditional support of Israel... which by your logic, indicates that Denmark is its blind and unconditional enemy.Click here and here to find out how close the George Washington Bridge came to being blown up on 9/11 and why all evidence against those terrorists was classified. Click here to see the influence of Neocon Zionists in the USA and how they benefitted from 9/11. Remember the USS Liberty and the Lavon Affair.Comment
-
-
What does this have to do with what I posted?Originally posted by Slaughtermeyer
Denmark is still nowhere near the US when it comes to blind and unconditional support for Israel. For example, during the 53rd Session of the United Nations General Assembly 1998 - 99, on the 22 resolutions negative or critical of Israel the US voted "no" 17 times (1 yes and 3 abstentions) as opposed to 0 no votes from Denmark.
Mogens Lykketoft, Denmark's Foreign Minister, has described Israel's targeted killing of Hamas leaders as the moral equivalent of the assassination of Israel's tourism minister Rehavam Ze'evi, has gone on record as stating that it was Israel, not the Palestinians, which was responsible for the violence; and has called for EU economic sanctions against Israel. The Danish General Workers' Union already boycotts Israeli products."A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin BuberComment
-
Nothing. Just an opportunity to let some anti-israelean steam out.Originally posted by lord of the mark
What does this have to do with what I posted?With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
Comment