The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Nope. Property rights and the observence of last will and testament requests.
"Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
I don't think that's a problem with philosophy per se, but with the limitations of natural languages like english or french. When you think and when you have to prove your point in a natural language, the result will obviously be less rigorous. That's why mathematics and highly mathematized sciences like physics are extremely rigorous, much more so than most of philosophy.
But given the limitations of natural languages, I think that we philosophers are, if we're doing our job properly, more rigorous than most people.
Btw, your assuming philosophers never use mathematics or formal logic. You should read philosophers like Carnap. He's quite rigorous...
Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – Lessing
Its only rigorous if you stretch properly first. Otherwise you dog the whole dance routine.
"Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
Now philosophers being replaced by rigorous acting porn stars erm... interpretative dancers is a different matter.
"Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
Originally posted by molly bloom
Whenever anyone suggests book burning (which isn't censorship per se, or at least can only be seen as the extremest form of censorship) then I think of Heine and his prophetic remarks:
‘Where they have burned books, they will end up burning human beings.’ ' Almansor ' .
Yah, but he also said
"Since the Exodus, freedom has always spoken with a Hebrew accent."
Obviously just another Likudnik baby killer
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
The relation between the natural sciences, on the one hand, and the social sciences and the humanities, on the other, is at an all time low. I'm sick and tired of it. Instead of childlishly dissing each other, we could learn from one another. When I teach philosophy of science, one of my goal is to fight the clichés about science. In part because of those clichés, a lot of students become hostile to science, and hence don't acquire a scientific culture. A student of mine told me point blank that he doesn't attend class because he hates science and philosophy of science...
They have no idea what they are talking about anyway.
I don't know, Ramo is quite open and articulate. Others are either trolling or, like Kuci, they're seeking the approval of the other scientists on 'poly: he's saying what he thinks they want to hear.
Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – Lessing
Originally posted by nostromo
I don't think that's a problem with philosophy per se, but with the limitations of natural languages like english or french.
There's no difference, ultimately. If philosophy were rigorous it could create its own symbolic logic.
I don't know, Ramo is quite open and articulate. Others are either trolling or, like Kuci, they're seeking the approval of the other scientists on 'poly: he's saying what he thinks they want to hear.
Where'd you get that? I'm trolling AND I'm saying what I think is true AND I'm enlisting the support of others to own Aggie.
Comment