Your link is hard for me to believe simply because it has everything I have thought it would be and more.
The trail of public funds to ad agencies and then back to the Liberal Party of Canada was already a foregone conclusion. That much has already been hinted at loudly enough that it's gotta be fact.
Where your blogger went over the line was bringing up the Mafia connection. Over the top. However, understandable if someone wanted to fill in the blanks on a darkened hearing by pulling every thread of impropriety recently associated with the Liberals.
If it bears out that Gaglianno was a made man, and the Mafia played a part in the scandal, I'll eat my shorts.
It's simply too good to be true. The Liberal Party of Canada would be destroyed for a generation, if not more. Chretien was a sly little bugger, but he wasn't that stupid. Was he?
The trail of public funds to ad agencies and then back to the Liberal Party of Canada was already a foregone conclusion. That much has already been hinted at loudly enough that it's gotta be fact.
Where your blogger went over the line was bringing up the Mafia connection. Over the top. However, understandable if someone wanted to fill in the blanks on a darkened hearing by pulling every thread of impropriety recently associated with the Liberals.
If it bears out that Gaglianno was a made man, and the Mafia played a part in the scandal, I'll eat my shorts.
It's simply too good to be true. The Liberal Party of Canada would be destroyed for a generation, if not more. Chretien was a sly little bugger, but he wasn't that stupid. Was he?
Comment