Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Google now faster with Firefox

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    There are many cases where internet usage (both hosting and consuer connections) is charged by the number of bytes transferred. Prefetch is a good way to inflate bytes transferred and thus, ISP profits.
    “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

    ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

    Comment


    • #17
      That's also why you can disable the feature.
      "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
      Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Alex
        google is the new microsoft, with all this restriction to other browsers other than the one they choose.
        Except google and firefox cost me nothing.
        Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Asher
          That's also why you can disable the feature.
          Should be the other way around: disabled by default.

          Originally posted by chegitz guevara
          Except google and firefox cost me nothing.
          Neither do IE and MSN search.
          Concrete, Abstract, or Squoingy?
          "I don't believe in giving scripting languages because the only additional power they give users is the power to create bugs." - Mike Breitkreutz, Firaxis

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Immortal Wombat
            Should be the other way around: disabled by default.
            So should loading images from sites other than the one you're on (linked images), by this logic.
            "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
            Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

            Comment


            • #21
              Well that would solve everyone's leeching problems. It would prevent people dropping NSFW images into forum threads. Images can still be linked to without inlining them, hopefully with a handy description of what is going to be loaded.

              The main difference is that images are usually going to be appropriate to the place that they're found. Until Google is bomb-proof, that isn't guaranteed that that will be the case for search results.
              Concrete, Abstract, or Squoingy?
              "I don't believe in giving scripting languages because the only additional power they give users is the power to create bugs." - Mike Breitkreutz, Firaxis

              Comment

              Working...
              X