I don't know, but most of the CP stuff is quite well written, apart from the translated material from other sources.
Anyway, CP is too middle of the road.
Anyway, CP is too middle of the road.
Some of it is good, but some of it is crap. The problem with CP is that it doesn't discriminate between between the good and the crap well enough. ZMag, Guardian, Nation, etc. do that much better.
I'd consider CP a progressive/radical (socialdem, socialist, anarchist, commie) magazine. I don't see that as a problem in any way, just saying that it's not representative of the Dems.
Comment