Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WTH - Decency Restriction to be Impose on Cable and Sats?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • WTH - Decency Restriction to be Impose on Cable and Sats?

    This wouldn't hold up, at least one would hope.


    Reuters

    Senator: Decency Rules Should Apply to Pay TV, Radio


    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens said on Tuesday he would push for applying broadcast decency standards to cable television and subscription satellite TV and radio.

    "Cable is a much greater violator in the indecency area," the Alaska Republican told the National Association of Broadcasters, which represents most local television and radio affiliates. "I think we have the same power to deal with cable as over-the-air" broadcasters.

    "There has to be some standard of decency," he said. But he also cautioned that "No one wants censorship."

    Stevens told reporters afterward that he would push legislation to apply the standards to cable TV and satellite radio and television. It could become part of a pending bill to boost fines on broadcasters who violate indecency restrictions or of an effort to overhaul U.S. communications laws.

    If Stevens is successful, it could pose new problems for raunchy radio host Howard Stern, who has said he was forced to leave broadcast radio for satellite radio to avoid decency limits -- and Federal Communications Commission fines.

    So far the restrictions have not applied to subscription services offered by companies like cable TV operators Comcast Corp. and Time Warner Inc. or XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and Sirius Satellite Radio Inc., which recently signed Stern.

    Last year the Senate Commerce Committee narrowly defeated an amendment to a bill boosting fines for indecency that would have extended such limits to cable and satellite services.

    Sen. George Allen, a Commerce Committee member and Virginia Republican, told reporters he would be "hesitant to expand it to those" services.

    While lawmakers and some parents groups are anxious to wipe the airwaves clean of indecency after singer Janet Jackson bared her breast last year during the Super Bowl halftime show, President Bush has said parents are the first line of defense and can just "turn it off."

    Federal regulations bar broadcast television and radio stations from airing obscene material and restrict indecent material, such as sexually explicit discussions or profanity, to late-night hours when children are less likely to be watching or listening.

    Stevens said he disagreed "violently" with assertions by the cable industry that Congress does not have the authority to impose limits on its content.

    "If that's the issue they want to take on, we'll take it on and let the Supreme Court decide," he said.

    A spokesman for the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, which represents cable operators, was not immediately available for comment.

    The U.S. House of Representatives has approved legislation to raise fines to $500,000 from $32,500 on television and radio broadcasters that violate indecency limits. The Senate has legislation pending to increase fines as well.

    But neither bill has provisions that would extend indecency restrictions to cable and satellite services. So far the White House has expressed support for the House bill, and made no public pronouncement about the Senate measure.



    © Copyright Reuters Ltd. All rights reserved. The information contained In this news report may not be published, broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of Reuters Ltd.
    "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

    “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

  • #2
    See other thread for righetous indignation over the matter.
    "Remember, there's good stuff in American culture, too. It's just that by "good stuff" we mean "attacking the French," and Germany's been doing that for ages now, so, well, where does that leave us?" - Elok

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Admiral
      See other thread for righetous indignation over the matter.
      This is an irrelevant statement if you don't post a link...
      The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.

      The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.

      Comment


      • #4
        If you mean the 99.8% complaint thread, this is new news.
        "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

        “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

        Comment


        • #5
          This wouldn't hold up, at least one would hope.
          One thread, complain about "legislation from the bench," here...
          meet the new boss, same as the old boss

          Comment


          • #6
            Funny, I still don't see a link... though I do know where the thread in question is.
            The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.

            The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.

            Comment


            • #7
              Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens said on Tuesday he would push for applying broadcast decency standards to cable television and subscription satellite TV and radio.
              One of the princes of pork barrel politics, a real scumbag.
              I suspect this is to extort money from the cable/sat companies...

              "There has to be some standard of decency," he said. But he also cautioned that "No one wants censorship."
              Yeah, its never "we want to censor" all the while they speak of how we need censorship.

              "Cable is a much greater violator in the indecency area,"
              Dont watch.

              President Bush has said parents are the first line of defense and can just "turn it off."
              True for broadcast media, but if he sticks to his guns.

              This is pay for TV, that supposedly means its private and contractual. The argument that "the people" - the politicians - own the public airwaves doesn't hold water here.

              Comment


              • #8
                The government does have some control over cable/sat content if they wanted to exercise it (I don't think add'l laws would be needed at least for satellite), but I think more controls would cross the line of what is generally thought to be reasonable, given the fact that you buy in to the smut in progressive stages.

                I've always wondered why local governments haven't cracked down on the smut in their franchise agreements with the cablecos.
                I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                Comment


                • #9
                  Berz is correct in that govenremtn oversight of public airwaves are the rationale for applying decency standard for public TV & radio. The thought process was licensing of those airwaves required compliance with governemnt decency. Licensing was historically necessary to prevent predatory use of frequencies. (those with the biggest towers could drown out the little guys). As part and parcel of the licensing arrangement came with it the necessity to comply with government standards (including decency of content).

                  Since sats and cable are not beholden to the government for these licensing arrangements, they should not be bound by standards to their content. It should be stricken down immediately by the courts once passed.
                  "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                  “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    come on guys, it's time to overthrow the U.S. goverment. serious.

                    Who's with me?

                    give me titties on tv or give me death.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Ted Stevens really is a piece of ****. I'm not even talking about his claims of indecency in entertainment I'm talking about his abuse of US tax payers with his massive pork barreling politics. Why can't we have decency limits for politicians?
                      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by mrmitchell

                        One thread, complain about "legislation from the bench," here...
                        If by legislation from the bench you mean actually interpreting constitutionality of legislation then yes this would actually be finally a proper exercise of judical review.
                        "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                        “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          It should be stricken down immediately by the courts once passed.


                          Why? It's interstate commerce, is it not? If its defined as obscenity is banned, then you have problems because the First Amendment has been said not to cover obscene material.

                          It'll probably be legal (as long as they don't overreach, but that's a BIIIG if), but very, very, very bad policy.
                          “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                          - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I just hope they don't try to regulate HBO. I'd have to do something then.

                            I can care less about the crappy channels like spike TV.

                            It might be interesting if they go after comedy central. They get away with alot. I admit I was shocked at how much South Park got away with.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Ted Stevens really is a piece of ****.
                              Ain't he though? He's the GOP's Robert Byrd

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X