There's some disagreement about the date of the inception of democracy in the United States. Was America a democracy from the start? Can a line be drawn? Does democracy exist anywhere?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
American Democracy
Collapse
X
-
American Democracy
441775 - Second Continental Congress6.82%31776 - Declaration of Independence4.55%21781 - Articles of Confederation, Yorktown4.55%21783 - Peace with the British Empire0.00%01788 - Adoption of the Constitution9.09%41789 - First Presidential Election4.55%21802 - Repeal of the Alien and Sedition Acts0.00%01828 - Universal White Male Suffrage0.00%01863 - Abolition of Slavery0.00%01870 - Universal Male Suffrage0.00%01920 - Universal Suffrage27.27%121964 - Prohibition of Entrenched Racism/Sexism6.82%33001 - NIXON's BACK!9.09%4It's not a democracy without proportional representation.27.27%12Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.comTags: None
-
Dammit. The form cut off two of my options:
( ) It's not a democracy without referenda on major issues.
( ) Vote Chiquita Banana for President!
Could a moderator add them? Thanks.Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.com
-
Virginia and Massachusetts both had fully functioning (ok, fully for white male land owners) colonial assembles in the 17th century (I.E. 1600's).Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oerdin
Virginia and Massachusetts both had fully functioning (ok, fully for white male land owners) colonial assembles in the 17th century (I.E. 1600's).
Comment
-
The US was never conceived of as a Democracy. The framers feared and distrusted democracy as mob rule. That being said, the founders were all adherents to Liberalism. They wanted to create a Republic consistent within the framework of Enlightenment Liberalism. They did so. The US has been a Liberal Republic since inception.
However, to be consistent with our current understanding of democracy (everyone gets a vote), I'd say that the US became a "democracy" with universal suffrage.I'm about to get aroused from watching the pokemon and that's awesome. - Pekka
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oerdin
Virginia and Massachusetts both had fully functioning (ok, fully for white male land owners) colonial assembles in the 17th century (I.E. 1600's).
I was thinking more along the lines of country-wide practices. Universal suffrage was implemented in many states several decades before it became federal law.Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.com
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wycoff
The US was never conceived of as a Democracy. The framers feared and distrusted democracy as mob rule. That being said, the founders were all adherents to Liberalism. They wanted to create a Republic consistent within the framework of Enlightenment Liberalism. They did so. The US has been a Liberal Republic since inception.
However, to be consistent with our current understanding of democracy (everyone gets a vote), I'd say that the US became a "democracy" with universal suffrage.
I would go with universal suffrage as well. Sure black men and women were still pressured in some areas. But overall, everyone could vote- at least in theory.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Geronimo
How can you have any kind of democracy (rule with the explicit consent of the majority) when the majority can't vote?
More seriously, it's a good question. "Democracy" is a word that requires a good defnition, which is not always easy. Robert A. Dahl has provided a widely accepted definition (though scholars are not unanimous to support it), in 8 criteria. I don't know them by heart, and I must go eat, but feel free to go look for them on google"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
Comment
-
The Articles of Confederation. I think the question of democracy is important. Are we looking at it from our view of democracy, or what democracy meant at the period of time. After all, blacks and women were not considered to be full persons at that time. So, that question is important to consider.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
The Articles of Confederation. I think the question of democracy is important. Are we looking at it from our view of democracy, or what democracy meant at the period of time. After all, blacks and women were not considered to be full persons at that time. So, that question is important to consider.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
How did Athens have democracy? Democracy should be defined more by form than by universal suffrage.
Athens could only be considered a democracy if we declare that all of the non voting inhabitants weren't even citizens but just regarded as the equivalent of foreign non-citizen residents.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Geronimo
Blacks and women considered themselves to be full persons at the time“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Democracy should be defined more by form than by universal suffrage.I'm about to get aroused from watching the pokemon and that's awesome. - Pekka
Comment
-
Don't forget that traditional definitions aren't necessarily very helpful for this sort of discussion. We have at least two mostly unrelated interpretations of 'democracy' to contend with. One is the idealistic and constantly evolving 'democracy' as an ideology and virtue which has inspired revolutions and the other is a definition resulting from a sort of dry taxonomy of government structures which has had far less significance historically, except as a way of describing results after the fact.
Comment
Comment